CVE-2025-34519
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIlevia EVE X1 Server firmware versions ≤ 4.7.18.0.eden contain an insecure hashing algorithm vulnerability. The product stores passwords using the MD5 hash function without applying a per‑password salt. Because MD5 is a fast, unsalted hash, an attacker who obtains the password database can efficiently perform offline dictionary, rainbow‑table, or brute‑force attacks to recover the original passwords. Ilevia has declined to service this vulnerability, and recommends that customers not expose port 8080 to the internet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Ilevia EVE X1 Server firmware versions 4.7.18.0 and below stores user passwords using the MD5 hash function without applying per-password salts. Since MD5 is a fast cryptographic hash designed for speed rather than password storage, and lacks salt, attackers who obtain the password database can efficiently perform offline dictionary, rainbow-table, or brute-force attacks to recover plaintext passwords.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.7.18.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Ilevia EVE X1 Server deviceCheck your device documentation or system interface to confirm the device model is Ilevia Eve X1 ServerAffected if The device is not an Ilevia Eve X1 Server
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the device administration interface or use the command: `http://<device_ip>:8080/version` or check the firmware version displayed in the system settings. Compare the version number to the affected range: <= 4.7.18.0Affected if The installed firmware version is 4.7.18.0 or lower
-
Confirm the web service is runningVerify that port 8080 is listening on the device using: `nc -zv <device_ip> 8080` or `telnet <device_ip> 8080`Affected if Port 8080 responds and the web interface is accessible on the network
-
Check for user accountsLog into the device administration panel or examine the user configuration file if accessible via: `http://<device_ip>:8080/users` or similar user management endpointAffected if User accounts are configured in the system
If the device is an Ilevia Eve X1 Server with firmware version 4.7.18.0 or lower and has user accounts configured, the password storage vulnerability is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedVendor has declined to provide a firmware patch; as an interim measure, restrict network access to port 8080 to prevent external attackers from obtaining the password database. For permanent remediation, the firmware would need updating to use a slow, salted password hashing algorithm like bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2.
- Verify that port 8080 is not exposed to the internet by reviewing firewall rules and network access controls
- If port 8080 is currently exposed, configure firewall or network ACLs to block external access to port 8080
- Restrict access to port 8080 to only trusted internal IP addresses or VPN networks
- Confirm that remote administrative access to the EVE X1 Server is only available through properly secured channels
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-34519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-34519 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data