CVE-2025-37176
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command injection vulnerability in AOS-8 allows an authenticated privileged user to alter a package header to inject shell commands, potentially affecting the execution of internal operations. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated malicious actor to execute commands with the privileges of the impacted mechanism.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command injection vulnerability in Aruba AOS-8 allows an authenticated privileged user to alter package headers to inject arbitrary shell commands, potentially executing with elevated privileges of the impacted mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.6.0.0, < 8.10.0.21>= 8.11.0.0, < 8.13.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed AOS versionAccess the Aruba device CLI and run 'show version' to retrieve the current AOS-8 firmware version. Alternatively, check via WebUI under Maintenance > Firmware or via API if available.Affected if The displayed version falls within the affected ranges: >= 8.6.0.0 and < 8.10.0.21, OR >= 8.11.0.0 and < 8.13.1.1
-
Compare version to fixed releasesVerify whether the installed version is 8.10.0.21 or higher, or 8.13.1.1 or higher. Versions at or above these thresholds are not affected by this vulnerability.Affected if The installed version is below 8.10.0.21 or is between 8.11.0.0 and 8.13.1.0 (inclusive)
-
Confirm administrative user access methodReview user accounts with privileged access by running 'show user' or checking the local user database via 'show local-userdb' or the WebUI under Authentication > Users. Identify which accounts have administrative or root-level privileges.Affected if The device has any administrative accounts configured, as this vulnerability requires an authenticated privileged user to exploit the package header injection vector
-
Inspect for suspicious package header configurationsIf supported, review any package upload or installation mechanisms on the device. Check system logs (run 'show log system') for any recent package import or header modification activities that could indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Any unusual package import operations or unexpected modifications to package header configurations are found in logs or system history
A system is affected if it runs AOS-8 version 8.6.0.0 through 8.10.0.20, or 8.11.0.0 through 8.13.1.0, and has at least one authenticated privileged user account that could potentially trigger the command injection via package header manipulation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.10.0.218.13.1.1
Restrict administrative access to trusted personnel only, monitor for suspicious administrative activities, and apply vendor-provided patches when released.
8.10.0.21+ (8.10.x branch) or 8.13.1.1+ (8.13.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current ArubaOS version by logging into the Aruba controller CLI and running 'show version'
- 2. Based on current version, determine the appropriate upgrade path: if on 8.6.x through 8.9.x, upgrade to 8.10.0.21 or later 8.10.x releases; if on 8.11.x or 8.12.x, upgrade to 8.13.1.1 or later 8.13.x releases
- 3. Review the Aruba upgrade guide at support.hpe.com for pre-upgrade requirements and procedures
- 4. Backup the current controller configuration using 'backup flash' or the WebUI
- 5. Download the appropriate firmware from support.hpe.com (requires valid support contract)
- 6. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require controller reboot
- 7. Upload the new firmware to the controller via WebUI or SCP/FTP
- 8. Initiate the upgrade via 'upgrade-software' command or WebUI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-37176 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-37176 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data