CVE-2025-39203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in the IEC 61850 of the MicroSCADA X SYS600 product. An IEC 61850-8 crafted message content from IED or remote system can cause a denial of service resulting in disconnection loop.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the IEC 61850 implementation of ABB MicroSCADA X SYS600 allows remote attackers to send crafted IEC 61850-8 messages from an IED or remote system that cause a denial of service, creating a persistent disconnection loop that disrupts SCADA operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.5, < 10.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed MicroSCADA X SYS600 versionCheck the product version through the system information panel in the MicroSCADA X SYS600 management interface, or review the installed software package details via the Windows Programs and Features control panel or system registryAffected if The installed version is 10.5.0 through 10.6.x (any version >= 10.5 and < 10.7)
-
Verify IEC 61850-8 protocol is enabledInspect the MicroSCADA X SYS600 protocol configuration settings to confirm IEC 61850-8 (MMS) communication is enabled as an active protocol driver in the system configurationAffected if IEC 61850-8 protocol is configured and active in the SCADA system
-
Check network exposure of IEC 61850 servicesReview network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the IEC 61850-8 service ports (typically TCP port 102 for MMS) are exposed to untrusted network segments or external systemsAffected if IEC 61850-8 services are accessible from network segments that contain untrusted or attacker-controlled IEDs or remote systems
-
Look for disconnection loop symptomsMonitor system logs, event logs, and SCADA operator displays for repeated IEC 61850 connection failures, persistent reconnection attempts, or cyclic disconnection patterns involving IEDs communicating via IEC 61850-8Affected if Multiple IEC 61850 devices are experiencing repeated disconnection and reconnection cycles that persist despite manual intervention
A system is affected if it runs MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.5 through 10.6.x with IEC 61850-8 protocol enabled and accessible to remote systems, particularly if disconnection loops are observed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.7
Implement strict input validation and message content filtering on IEC 61850-8 traffic, add rate limiting and connection state monitoring, and consider network segmentation to restrict IEC 61850 traffic to trusted sources.
MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.7
- Back up the current MicroSCADA X SYS600 configuration, databases, and all relevant data
- Review the version 10.7 release notes and upgrade documentation for any specific migration requirements or prerequisites
- Download the MicroSCADA X SYS600 version 10.7 installer from the Hitachi Energy support portal
- Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment first to verify compatibility with your specific configuration
- Schedule a maintenance window for the production upgrade
- Stop all MicroSCADA X SYS600 services according to the documented shutdown procedure
- Install version 10.7 following the official upgrade instructions
- Start the upgraded services and verify the system initializes correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-39203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-39203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data