CVE-2025-47202
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn RRC in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor, and Modem Exynos 980, 990, 850, 1080, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 1580, 9110, W920, W930, W1000, Modem 5123, Modem 5300, and Modem 5400, the lack of a length check leads to out-of-bounds writes.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in the Radio Resource Control (RRC) layer of Samsung's mobile/wearable modem processors. Insufficient length validation allows out-of-bounds write operations, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution or denial of service in the baseband firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device modelCheck your phone or wearable settings under 'About Phone' or 'About Device' to find the model number (e.g., SM-G980F, SM-F900, etc.)Affected if The device uses any Samsung Exynos chipset listed in the affected products
-
Determine the chipset variantLook up your device specifications on Samsung's website or a trusted tech specification database. Confirm whether the device uses an Exynos 980, 990, 850, 2100, 2200, 2400, 1580, or 1080 processorAffected if The device is powered by any of the affected Exynos chipsets (980, 990, 850, 2100, 2200, 2400, 1580, 1080)
-
Check baseband firmware versionOn Android, go to Settings > About Phone > Software Information and look for the 'Baseband' or 'Modem' version field. On wearables, check under Settings > About Watch > Software InfoAffected if The baseband version cannot be easily determined by end users; all firmware versions for these chipsets are affected since vendor states 'all versions'
-
Verify RRC layer is activeThe RRC (Radio Resource Control) layer is a fundamental component of cellular communication and is always active when the device has cellular or LTE/5G connectivity. No manual enablement required - this is default behavior for any phone or cellular-enabled wearableAffected if The device has cellular connectivity (LTE, 4G, or 5G) enabled and is powered on
If your Samsung phone or wearable uses any of the Exynos 980, 990, 850, 2100, 2200, 2400, 1580, or 1080 chipsets and has cellular connectivity, you are affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedVendor firmware updates from Samsung are required. Organizations should identify affected devices, coordinate with Samsung and mobile carriers for patch deployment, and prioritize patching given the critical CVSS 9.1 severity.
- Check for and apply the latest Samsung Android security patch update for your device, as firmware vulnerabilities in Exynos processors are addressed through monthly security updates
- Verify your device has the most recent firmware from Samsung's update channel
- If your device model is listed as affected and no update is available, monitor Samsung's security advisory pages for future patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,136.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-47202 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-47202 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data