dbcve.org
Dryice MyxalyticsApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2025-52656

HIGH · 7.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HCL MyXalytics: 6.6.  is affected by Mass Assignment vulnerability. Mass Assignment occurs when user input is automatically bound to application objects without proper validation or access controls, potentially allowing unauthorized modification of sensitive fields.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HCL MyXalytics 6.6 suffers from a Mass Assignment vulnerability where user-supplied HTTP request parameters are automatically bound to application objects without proper validation or access controls. This allows attackers to modify sensitive internal fields (such as role flags, permissions, or configuration values) by including them in requests, bypassing normal business logic safeguards.

MitigationImplement explicit field allowlisting (whitelist) for all data binding operations, using framework-specific mechanisms to restrict which properties can be mass-assigned. Additionally, apply role-based access control checks on sensitive fields before persistence.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dryice MyxalyticsApplication
Affected:= 6.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm the installed HCL MyXalytics version
    Locate the application version information in the product about page, installation directory, or admin interface under Help > About. Alternatively, check the version displayed in the application banner or release notes shipped with the deployment.
    Affected if The installed version is HCL MyXalytics or Hcltech Dryice Myxalytics version 6.6 exactly.
  2. Identify if the application accepts arbitrary HTTP parameters
    Send a test HTTP request to the application with an extra parameter not present in any form, such as adding a non-standard field like 'testParam=123' to a POST request. Observe if the application accepts and processes this parameter without returning an error.
    Affected if The application accepts and binds request parameters that are not explicitly defined in the expected data model.
  3. Test for mass assignment on sensitive fields
    Submit a request to a typical user action (such as profile update or form submission) including sensitive field names like 'role', 'isAdmin', 'permission', or 'adminFlag' as parameters. Compare the application's response and any changes to user state or configuration.
    Affected if Sensitive internal fields such as role flags, permissions, or configuration values can be modified through HTTP request parameters and are persisted without validation.
  4. Review application data binding configuration
    If you have access to the application's configuration files or source code, examine the data binding or object mapping settings to determine if there is a field allowlist or whitelist implemented for parameter binding.
    Affected if No field allowlist is configured for data binding operations, allowing all request parameters to be bound to application objects.

A user is affected if they are running HCL MyXalytics version 6.6 and the application allows modification of sensitive internal fields (such as role flags, permissions, or configuration values) through arbitrary HTTP request parameters without explicit allowlisting.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement explicit field allowlisting (whitelist) for all data binding operations, using framework-specific mechanisms to restrict which properties can be mass-assigned. Additionally, apply role-based access control checks on sensitive fields before persistence.

Fix this in Dryice Myxalytics Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
50.0 hours of engineering $8,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52656 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data