Threadx Netx DuoApplication · Eclipse

CVE-2025-55090

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.4.4.202503 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() function when received an Ethernet frame with less than 4 bytes of IP packet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

NetX Duo before 6.4.4 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() function. When processing an Ethernet frame containing an IP packet with fewer than 4 bytes of data, the function attempts to read IP header fields without validating that sufficient bytes are present, leading to a read beyond the buffer boundary.

MitigationUpgrade NetX Duo to version 6.4.4 or later. Alternatively, implement input validation in _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() to verify the IP packet contains at least 4 bytes before attempting to read IP header fields.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Threadx Netx DuoApplication
Affected:< 6.4.4.202503

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the NetX Duo version in your environment
    Locate the NetX Duo library or header files and check the version definition, typically found in nx_api.h or release notes
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 6.4.4.202503
  2. Confirm IPv4 packet reception is enabled
    Check your NetX Duo configuration (usually in tx_user.h or netxduo.h) for NX_INCLUDE_IPV4 or NX_IP_V4 compilation flags
    Affected if IPv4 support (NX_INCLUDE_IPV4) is enabled in your build
  3. Verify your application uses the IP packet receive path
    Search your code for calls to nx_ip_raw_packet_receive or other IP receive functions that trigger _nx_ipv4_packet_receive
    Affected if Your application or stack processes incoming IPv4 packets via the raw packet receive path
  4. Determine if the device accepts external network input
    Review your network configuration for NX_ENABLE_IP_RAW_PACKET_FILTER or similar settings that allow processing of external Ethernet frames
    Affected if Your system accepts and processes inbound Ethernet frames containing IP packets from external sources

You are affected if your NetX Duo version is below 6.4.4.202503, IPv4 is enabled, and your device processes incoming IPv4 packets from untrusted network sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.4.4.202503 or later
Fixed in 6.4.4.202503
Interim mitigation

Upgrade NetX Duo to version 6.4.4 or later. Alternatively, implement input validation in _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() to verify the IP packet contains at least 4 bytes before attempting to read IP header fields.

Recommended fix High confidence

NetX Duo 6.4.4 (or 6.4.4.202503)

  1. 1. Identify the current NetX Duo version in use by checking the library version or build configuration
  2. 2. Obtain NetX Duo version 6.4.4.202503 or later from the official Eclipse Foundation ThreadX repository
  3. 3. Replace the vulnerable NetX Duo library/binary with the fixed version in your project
  4. 4. Rebuild the firmware or application using the updated NetX Duo library
  5. 5. Verify the build completes successfully and test the device/firmware to ensure normal network operations function correctly

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Threadx Netx Duo Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,540
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55090 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55090 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data