CVE-2025-55091
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ip_packet_receive() function when received an Ethernet with type set as IP but no IP data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the _nx_ip_packet_receive() function in NetX Duo before version 6.4.4. The vulnerability is triggered when the function processes an Ethernet frame with type set to IP (0x0800) but containing no actual IP data, causing the function to read beyond the packet buffer bounds.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.4.202503CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the NetX Duo library versionLocate the NetX Duo library or header files in your deployment and check for version defines such as NX_DUEO_VERSION_MAJOR, NX_DUO_VERSION_MINOR, or NX_VERSION macros. If NetX Duo is linked as a binary library, check the library file metadata or contact your vendor for the exact version string.Affected if The version is lower than 6.4.4.202503 (e.g., 6.4.3, 6.3.x, or earlier releases).
-
Verify IP packet receive processing is enabledInspect your NetX Duo configuration (typically in a header file like nx_user.h or a custom configuration header) for the definition NX_INCLUDE_IP_RECEIVE or related IP receive functionality macros. Also check if your application initializes IP instances via nx_ip_create() or nx_ip_initialize().Affected if IP packet processing is enabled and your device accepts incoming Ethernet frames.
-
Confirm exposure to untrusted network trafficReview your network interface configuration to determine if the device is directly exposed to untrusted networks or can receive Ethernet frames from external sources. Check if there are firewall rules or network segmentation that limit which hosts can send traffic to the device.Affected if The device can receive raw Ethernet frames from untrusted sources on port or interface that NetX Duo monitors for IP traffic.
-
Check for recent security updatesReview your software Bill of Materials (SBOM), vendor release notes, or patch history to see if a security update addressing CVE-2025-55091 has been applied to your NetX Duo component.Affected if No patch for CVE-2025-55091 has been applied and the version remains below 6.4.4.202503.
Your environment is affected if NetX Duo version is below 6.4.4.202503 AND your device processes incoming IP-type Ethernet frames from potentially untrusted network sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.4.202503
Upgrade NetX Duo to version 6.4.4 or later which contains the bounds checking fix for this vulnerability.
6.4.4.202503
- 1. Identify all instances of ThreadX NetX Duo in your deployment that are running versions prior to 6.4.4.202503
- 2. Obtain the ThreadX NetX Duo 6.4.4.202503 or later release from the official Eclipse Foundation distribution channels
- 3. Review the release notes and changelog for version 6.4.4 to understand any changes relevant to your implementation
- 4. In a testing environment, replace the NetX Duo library binary with version 6.4.4.202503 or newer
- 5. Test your application's networking functionality, particularly Ethernet packet reception and IP packet processing
- 6. Verify that the _nx_ip_packet_receive() function handles malformed packets correctly (Ethernet frames with IP type but no IP data)
- 7. If all tests pass, deploy the updated NetX Duo library to production environments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55091 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55091 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data