CVE-2025-55111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain files with overly permissive permissions were identified in the out-of-support Control-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 to 9.0.20 and potentially earlier unsupported versions as well as in newer versions which were upgraded from an affected version. These files contain keys and passwords relating to SSL files, keystore and policies. An attacker with local access to the system running the Agent can access these files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceControl-M/Agent versions 9.0.18 through 9.0.20 (and potentially earlier unsupported versions, including upgrades from affected versions) ship with SSL key files, keystores, and policy password files configured with overly permissive permissions. A local attacker with access to the system can read these sensitive credential files containing SSL keys and passwords.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.0.21CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Control-M/Agent versionRun the command to check the installed Control-M/Agent version, such as 'ctmversion' or check the installation directory for version informationAffected if The installed version is 9.0.18, 9.0.19, or 9.0.20, or any version prior to 9.0.21 that was upgraded from an affected version
-
Locate SSL key and keystore filesSearch for common SSL key files (.key, .pem), keystores (.jks, .keystore), and truststores in the Control-M/Agent installation directory and subdirectoriesAffected if Any SSL key files or keystores exist in the Control-M/Agent installation path
-
Locate policy password filesSearch for policy configuration files that may contain embedded passwords, typically found in Control-M/Agent configuration directoriesAffected if Policy configuration files with embedded passwords exist in the Control-M/Agent installation
-
Verify file permissions on sensitive credential filesUse 'ls -la' or 'icacls' (Windows) to examine permissions on all identified SSL key files, keystores, and policy password filesAffected if Any of these sensitive files are readable by users other than the Control-M service account (e.g., have world-readable, group-readable, or overly broad ACL permissions)
You are affected if Control-M/Agent version is below 9.0.21 AND sensitive credential files (SSL keys, keystores, policy password files) are readable by non-privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.21
Identify and restrict file permissions on all SSL/keystore/policy files in affected Control-M/Agent installations to the service account only; rotate any exposed credentials as a precautionary measure.
Control-M/Agent version 9.0.21 or later (latest supported release)
- 1. Verify current Control-M/Agent version by checking the installed version on affected systems
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the current Control-M/Agent configuration, including any custom policies, SSL keys, and keystore files
- 4. Download Control-M/Agent version 9.0.21 or later from the official BMC support site (bmcapps.my.site.com)
- 5. Stop the Control-M/Agent services before upgrading
- 6. Install the Control-M/Agent 9.0.21 (or latest supported version) using the standard upgrade procedure
- 7. Verify that the new version is running correctly and that services have started successfully
- 8. Confirm that file permissions on SSL keys, keystore, and policy files have been corrected to restrictive permissions (typically 600 or stricter for sensitive files)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-55111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-55111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data