CVE-2025-58585
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple endpoints with sensitive information do not require authentication, making the application susceptible to information gathering.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple endpoints that should be protected by authentication are publicly accessible without any credentials, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve sensitive information from the application. The lack of access controls on these endpoints enables reconnaissance and potential further exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Sick Analytics productCheck the application name/version in the software inventory or running services. Look for: Sick Baggage Analytics, Sick Logistic Diagnostic Analytics, Sick Package Analytics, or Sick Tire AnalyticsAffected if Any of these four products is installed and running
-
Identify accessible API endpointsProbe common API paths such as /api/, /rest/, /endpoints/, or the product-specific paths. Use a web scanner or manual HTTP requests without providing any authentication headersAffected if HTTP responses are received (200 OK or similar) without providing any credentials
-
Test endpoint authentication requirementSend HTTP requests to suspected sensitive endpoints (e.g., /api/data, /api/users, /api/config, /api/logs) without Authorization or session cookies. Compare responses to authenticated requestsAffected if Sensitive data is returned in responses without any authentication credentials provided
-
Check authentication configurationInspect the application configuration files (e.g., web.xml, application.properties, security config) for endpoint access control rules. Look for security filters, authentication middleware, or authorization policiesAffected if Missing or disabled authentication rules for sensitive endpoints, or security filters set to permissive
-
Review exposed services and portsScan internal network or localhost for the product's web interface. Check if the service binds to 0.0.0.0 or all interfaces instead of localhost onlyAffected if The analytics interface is accessible from network addresses without authentication
A user is affected if any Sick Analytics product (Baggage, Logistic Diagnostic, Package, or Tire) is running and its sensitive endpoints return data without requiring authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on all endpoints that expose sensitive data, ensuring unauthenticated users cannot access restricted resources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58585 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58585 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data