CVE-2025-58590
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIt's possible to brute force folders and files, what can be used by an attacker to steal sensitve information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability exists that allows attackers to brute force discover folders and files on the system, potentially exposing sensitive information. This appears to stem from insufficient access controls, missing rate limiting, or inadequate path validation that would prevent unauthorized enumeration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.6.1<= 4.6.1<= 4.6.1<= 4.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionLocate the Sick Analytics product installed in your environment (Baggage Analytics, Logistic Diagnostic Analytics, Package Analytics, or Tire Analytics) and determine its exact version number. Consult the product's about page, installation directory, or version metadata file.Affected if The product version is 4.6.1 or lower.
-
Verify authentication is enforced on all endpointsInspect the application's access control configuration or middleware to confirm that authentication is required for all file and directory access endpoints. Test by attempting to access common paths without providing credentials.Affected if Any file or directory listing endpoint is accessible without authentication.
-
Confirm rate limiting is configuredReview the application's configuration files or web server settings to verify rate limiting or request throttling is enabled on endpoints that provide file or directory information.Affected if Rate limiting is absent or disabled on file/directory enumeration endpoints.
-
Check for path validation mechanismsExamine the application's request handling code or configuration to determine if input validation exists that restricts file path requests to authorized directories only.Affected if Path validation is missing or insufficient, allowing arbitrary directory traversal or enumeration.
Your environment is affected if you are running any of the Sick Analytics products (Baggage, Logistic Diagnostic, Package, or Tire) at version 4.6.1 or lower and any file/directory enumeration endpoints lack authentication, rate limiting, or proper path validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization checks, add rate limiting to prevent automated enumeration, and validate all file path requests to prevent unauthorized access to directories and files.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58590 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58590 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data