CVE-2025-58591
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA remote, unauthorized attacker can brute force folders and files and read them like private keys or configurations, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to brute force directory paths and filenames to discover and access sensitive files such as private keys and configuration files, potentially exposing credentials and enabling further attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Sick Analytics products are deployedInventory your environment for installed software matching these names: Sick Baggage Analytics, Sick Logistic Diagnostic Analytics, Sick Package Analytics, or Sick Tire Analytics. Check running services, installed applications, or container images for these product names.Affected if Any of these four products are present in the environment regardless of version.
-
Determine if the service is network accessibleIdentify the network binding and authentication configuration for the deployed Sick Analytics product. Check whether it listens on external interfaces or is protected by authentication mechanisms.Affected if The service is accessible to unauthenticated network attackers (e.g., exposed to the internet, no authentication required for access).
-
Verify file access controls are in placeExamine the product configuration for access controls governing file and directory enumeration. Check whether the application enforces proper authorization before returning file or directory information.Affected if The product allows unauthenticated users to request arbitrary file paths or directory listings without access control validation.
-
Check for sensitive file exposure riskTest whether the product allows access to files outside the intended web root or application directory, such as configuration files, private keys, or other system files, through direct path requests.Affected if The product permits directory traversal or allows unauthenticated enumeration that could expose private keys or configuration files.
You are affected if any of the Sick Analytics products (Baggage, Logistic Diagnostic, Package, or Tire) are running and accessible to unauthenticated users, allowing them to brute force file paths and access sensitive files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization for all sensitive files, add rate limiting to prevent brute force enumeration, and restrict access to private keys and configuration files outside the web root.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-58591 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-58591 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data