CVE-2025-9064
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA path traversal security issue exists within FactoryTalk View Machine Edition, allowing unauthenticated attackers on the same network as the device to delete any file within the panels operating system. Exploitation of this vulnerability is dependent on the knowledge of filenames to be deleted.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in FactoryTalk View Machine Edition allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network as the device to delete arbitrary files on the panel's operating system by manipulating file paths. The critical severity (CVSS 9.1) stems from the combination of network accessibility, lack of authentication required, and the ability to delete any file if the filename is known.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if FactoryTalk View Machine Edition is installedCheck the installed programs on the Windows-based panel or engineering workstation for FactoryTalk View Machine Edition or FactoryTalk View SE/MEAffected if The product is present on the system
-
Determine the installed version of FactoryTalk ViewOpen the software's About dialog, check the Windows installed programs list version column, or locate version info in the program's installation directoryAffected if The version number is 15.0 or lower, or no version number is displayed (indicating an older release)
-
Verify if the panel service is network-accessibleCheck network configuration of the panel to determine if it accepts connections from untrusted network segments. Use netstat or firewall rules to identify listening ports associated with FactoryTalk ViewAffected if The FactoryTalk View service ports are bound to accessible network interfaces and reachable from untrusted IP addresses
-
Confirm if unauthenticated access is possibleReview the FactoryTalk View security configuration and service settings to determine if authentication is required for file operations or if the service allows anonymous/network accessAffected if The service permits unauthenticated or network-based file operations without requiring credentials
A system is affected if FactoryTalk View Machine Edition version 15.0 or lower is installed and the service is accessible from the network without authentication protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate FactoryTalk View Machine Edition panels on a restricted network segment with firewall rules limiting access to trusted hosts only, and apply any available vendor patches when released.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9064 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data