CVE-2026-21310
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass, with limited impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe Commerce versions prior to 2.4.4-p16, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.8-p3, and 2.4.9-alpha3 contain an improper input validation vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass security features through crafted input, with limited impact to data integrity. No user interaction is required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.4= 2.4.4= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 2.4.9< 1.3.3= 1.3.3= 1.3.4= 1.3.5= 1.4.2= 1.5.2= 1.5.3< 2.4.5= 2.4.5= 2.4.6= 2.4.7= 2.4.8= 2.4.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Adobe Commerce versionRun the command: php bin/magento --version or check the composer.json file in the Magento root directory for the version fieldAffected if The version displayed is any of: < 2.4.4, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, or 2.4.9 (unless it is a patched version: 2.4.4-p16+, 2.4.5-p15+, 2.4.6-p13+, 2.4.7-p8+, 2.4.8-p3+, or 2.4.9-alpha3+)
-
Determine installed Adobe Magento versionRun the command: php bin/magento --version or check composer.json for the magento/version packageAffected if The version displayed is any of: < 2.4.5, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, or 2.4.9 (unless it is a patched version as noted above)
-
Check if Adobe Commerce B2B module is installedRun: php bin/magento module:status | grep -i b2b or check app/etc/config.php for Magento_Company and Magento_B2b entriesAffected if The B2B module is present and the version is any of: < 1.3.3, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4.2, 1.5.2, or 1.5.3 (unless it is a patched version)
-
Confirm patch level for affected major versionsIf running 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.8, or 2.4.9, check the composer.lock or run: php bin/magento --version to see the full version string including patch levelAffected if The full version string shows a patch level lower than p16 for 2.4.4, p15 for 2.4.5, p13 for 2.4.6, p8 for 2.4.7, p3 for 2.4.8, or any version before alpha3 for 2.4.9
You are affected if your Adobe Commerce or Magento installation version matches any of the listed affected versions and is not updated to the specified minimum patched version for your major release line.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.32.4.42.4.5
Apply the appropriate Adobe Commerce security patch or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in Adobe's security bulletin. Review input validation points in the application to identify and harden the vulnerable code path.
Upgrade to the latest available patch for your release line (e.g., 2.4.4-p16, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.6-p13, or 2.4.7-p8 or later)
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Commerce/Magento installation version using bin/magento --version or composer show magento/product-community-edition
- 2. Review the Adobe Security Bulletin (helpx.adobe.com) for the specific patch corresponding to your version
- 3. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.4: Apply patch SUPEE-xxxxx or upgrade to 2.4.4-p16
- 4. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.5: Apply patch SUPEE-xxxxx or upgrade to 2.4.5-p15
- 5. For Adobe Commerce 2.4.6: Apply patch SUPEE-xxxxx or upgrade to 2.4.6-p13
- 6. For Magento 2.4.7: Upgrade to 2.4.7-p8 or later
- 7. For Adobe Commerce B2b: Apply corresponding B2B patch or upgrade to 1.3.5-pX
- 8. Test the upgrade/patch in a staging environment before production deployment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21310 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21310 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data