CVE-2026-22754
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in Spring Spring Security. If an application uses <sec:intercept-url servlet-path="/servlet-path" pattern="/endpoint/**"/> to define the servlet path for computing a path matcher, then the servlet path is not included and the related authorization rules are not exercised. This can lead to an authorization bypass.This issue affects Spring Security: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Spring Security 7.0.0-7.0.4, when using the servlet-path attribute in <sec:intercept-url> configuration to define a servlet path for path matching, the servlet path is incorrectly omitted from the path matching computation. This causes authorization rules defined with servlet-path to be bypassed, allowing unauthenticated or unauthorized access to protected endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Spring Security versionInspect your project build file (pom.xml, build.gradle) or runtime dependency management to find the Spring Security version in useAffected if The installed version is between 7.0.0 and 7.0.4 inclusive
-
Locate Spring Security XML configurationSearch for XML configuration files containing <sec:http> or <sec:intercept-url> elements, typically in WEB-INF/spring-security.xml or similar configuration filesAffected if XML-based security configuration files exist in the project
-
Check for servlet-path attribute usageWithin the XML configuration files, inspect <sec:intercept-url> elements for the presence of the servlet-path attributeAffected if The servlet-path attribute is defined on any <sec:intercept-url> element
-
Verify authorization behaviorTest protected endpoints defined with servlet-path to confirm authorization rules are actually being applied (e.g., access an endpoint that should require authentication but is accessible without credentials)Affected if Endpoints protected by intercept-url rules with servlet-path are accessible when they should be restricted
A user is affected if their application runs Spring Security 7.0.0-7.0.4 AND uses the servlet-path attribute in <sec:intercept-url> configuration, causing authorization rules to be bypassed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.5
Review all <sec:intercept-url> configurations using servlet-path attribute and verify authorization is working as expected. Consider upgrading to a patched version when available, or implement compensating controls such as additional filter-based authorization for affected endpoints.
7.0.5
- Identify your build configuration file (pom.xml for Maven or build.gradle for Gradle)
- Locate the Spring Security dependency declaration
- Update the spring-security-version property or the direct dependency version to 7.0.5 or later
- Run your build tool to fetch the updated dependency (e.g., mvn clean install or ./gradlew build)
- Rebuild and test your application to ensure authorization rules are now correctly applied
- Verify that the <sec:intercept-url> configuration with servlet-path now properly enforces access control
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22754 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22754 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data