CVE-2026-23824
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerabilities exist in a protocol-handling component of AOS-8 and AOS-10 Operating Systems. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending specially crafted network messages to the affected service. Due to insufficient input validation, successful exploitation may terminate a critical system process, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in the protocol-handling component of Aruba AOS-8 and AOS-10 operating systems. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit insufficient input validation in the affected service by sending specially crafted network messages, causing a critical system process to terminate and resulting in service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.5.4.0, < 8.10.0.22>= 8.11.0.0, < 8.12.0.7>= 8.13.0.0, < 8.13.1.2>= 10.4.0.0, < 10.4.1.11>= 10.5.0.0, < 10.7.2.3>= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.0, <= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7>= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0, <= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ArubaOS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show system information' on the Aruba device CLIAffected if The version displayed falls within any of these ranges: >= 6.5.4.0 and < 8.10.0.22; >= 8.11.0.0 and < 8.12.0.7; >= 8.13.0.0 and < 8.13.1.2; >= 10.4.0.0 and < 10.4.1.11; >= 10.5.0.0 and < 10.7.2.3
-
Identify installed SD-WAN versionExecute 'show version' or 'show sd-wan version' on the SD-WAN appliance CLIAffected if The version displayed falls within: >= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.0 and <= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7, or >= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0 and <= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9
-
Verify protocol-handling service is exposedCheck if the protocol-handling service (the vulnerable component) is accessible from untrusted network interfaces by reviewing 'show ip interface' and firewall policiesAffected if The service is bound to or accessible via interfaces in untrusted network segments (such as DMZ, guest, or internet-facing VLANs)
The environment is affected if the device runs an ArubaOS or SD-WAN version within the affected ranges AND the protocol-handling service is exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.10.0.228.12.0.78.13.1.2
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for AOS-8 and AOS-10 as soon as they become available. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the affected protocol-handling services to untrusted networks.
ArubaOS: 8.10.0.22+, 8.12.0.7+, 8.13.1.2+, or 10.4.1.11+ | SD-WAN: >8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7 or >8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9
- 1. Identify the current ArubaOS or SD-WAN version running on the affected device using 'show version' command
- 2. For ArubaOS 8.x: Upgrade to version 8.10.0.22 or later if running 8.10.x; upgrade to 8.12.0.7 or later if running 8.11.x; upgrade to 8.13.1.2 or later if running 8.13.x
- 3. For ArubaOS 10.x: Upgrade to version 10.4.1.11 or later if running 10.4.x
- 4. For SD-WAN: Upgrade to a version greater than 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7 if running the 8.6.0.4-2.2.x branch, or greater than 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9 if running the 8.7.0.0-2.3.x branch
- 5. Download the appropriate upgrade image from support.hpe.com and upload to the device controller
- 6. Execute the upgrade following standard Aruba upgrade procedures: 'upgrade-software' or via the WebUI under Maintenance > Software
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23824 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23824 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data