CVE-2026-24641
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the HTTP daemon via crafted HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in FortiWeb's HTTP daemon allows authenticated attackers to crash the service by sending specially crafted HTTP requests. The flaw exists across versions 7.0 through 8.0.2, indicating a persistent code-level issue in request handling logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.6.7>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm FortiWeb deploymentIdentify whether FortiWeb appliances or virtual machines are running in your environment. Check for FortiWeb processes or services on known FortiWeb systems.Affected if FortiWeb is not present in your environment - you are not affected.
-
Determine installed FortiWeb versionLog into the FortiWeb CLI and run the command: get system status. Alternatively, check the web UI under Dashboard > System Information > Firmware Version.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.0.0 through 7.6.6, or 8.0.0 through 8.0.2 - your version is within the affected range.
-
Check if HTTP/HTTPS management interface is enabledIn FortiWeb CLI, run: show system interface. Look for management interfaces with HTTP or HTTPS enabled. Alternatively, check via web UI under Network > Interfaces.Affected if HTTP or HTTPS management access is enabled on any interface - the vulnerable HTTP daemon is exposed.
-
Review administrative access controlsCheck admin user accounts and access profiles using: show system admin. Verify which IP addresses or ranges are permitted for administrative access.Affected if Administrative accounts can be accessed from untrusted networks - an attacker could potentially authenticate and trigger the vulnerability.
Your environment is affected if FortiWeb versions 7.0.0-7.6.6 or 8.0.0-8.0.2 are running with the HTTP management interface exposed to network locations where authenticated attackers could send crafted requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.78.0.3
Apply the vendor-supplied FortiWeb patches for the respective version branches (7.0.x, 7.2.x, 7.4.x, 7.6.x, or 8.0.x). If patches are unavailable, consider restricting administrative access to trusted IP addresses and implementing rate limiting on the management interface.
Upgrade to FortiWeb 7.6.7 or later for 7.x branch, or FortiWeb 8.0.3 or later for 8.x branch
- 1. Identify the current FortiWeb version by navigating to System > FortiView > Status or using the CLI command 'get system status'.
- 2. For FortiWeb 7.6.x deployments: Plan upgrade to version 7.6.7 or later.
- 3. For FortiWeb 8.0.x deployments: Plan upgrade to version 8.0.3 or later.
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the FortiWeb configuration via System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore or CLI command 'execute backup config'.
- 5. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com/).
- 6. Upload and install the firmware via System > Firmware or CLI command 'execute system firmware upgrade'.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the HTTP daemon is running and the new version is applied using 'get system status'.
- 8. Test that legitimate HTTP traffic is processing correctly after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-24641 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-24641 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data