PraisonaiagentsApplication · Praison

CVE-2026-34937

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.90 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.90, run_python() in praisonai constructs a shell command string by interpolating user-controlled code into python3 -c "<code>" and passing it to subprocess.run(..., shell=True). The escaping logic only handles \ and ", leaving $() and backtick substitutions unescaped, allowing arbitrary OS command execution before Python is invoked. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.90.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The run_python() function in PraisonAI constructs a shell command by interpolating user-controlled code into 'python3 -c "<code>"' and passing it to subprocess.run(..., shell=True). The escaping logic only handles backslash and double-quote characters, leaving command substitution syntax ($() and backticks) unescaped, enabling arbitrary OS command execution.

MitigationUpgrade to PraisonAI version 1.5.90 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PraisonaiagentsApplication
Affected:< 1.5.90

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify PraisonAI installation and version
    Run 'pip show praisonaiagents' or check your package manager to find the installed version of PraisonAI
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.5.90 (e.g., 1.5.89, 1.5.0, etc.)
  2. Locate the run_python() function in your codebase
    Search for 'def run_python' in your PraisonAI source files or installed package to find the vulnerable function
    Affected if The run_python() function exists in your environment (the function is present)
  3. Inspect subprocess.run usage within run_python()
    Open the run_python() function source and verify if subprocess.run is called with shell=True and string interpolation of user input
    Affected if subprocess.run is called with shell=True and user-controlled variables are directly interpolated into the command string
  4. Check for unescaped command substitution characters
    Examine the escaping logic in run_python() - look for how \ and " are handled versus $() and backticks
    Affected if The escaping logic only handles \ and " characters, leaving $() or backticks unescaped

You are affected if PraisonAI Praisonaiagents version is below 1.5.90 AND the run_python() function uses subprocess.run with shell=True and incomplete escaping of command substitution characters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.90 or later
Fixed in 1.5.90
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to PraisonAI version 1.5.90 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.5.90

  1. Check the current installed version of praisonaiagents by running: pip show praisonaiagents or pip list | grep praisonai
  2. Upgrade praisonaiagents to version 1.5.90 or later using: pip install --upgrade praisonaiagents==1.5.90
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: pip show praisonaiagents and confirming the version number

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Praisonaiagents Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34937 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34937 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data