CVE-2026-40288
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions below 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents, the workflow engine is vulnerable to arbitrary command and code execution through untrusted YAML files. When praisonai workflow run <file.yaml> loads a YAML file with type: job, the JobWorkflowExecutor in job_workflow.py processes steps that support run: (shell commands via subprocess.run()), script: (inline Python via exec()), and python: (arbitrary Python script execution)—all without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. The affected code paths include action_run() in workflow.py and _exec_shell(), _exec_inline_python(), and _exec_python_script() in job_workflow.py. An attacker who can supply or influence a workflow YAML file (particularly in CI pipelines, shared repositories, or multi-tenant deployment environments) can achieve full arbitrary command execution on the host system, compromising the machine and any accessible data or credentials. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.5.139 of PraisonAI and 1.5.140 of praisonaiagents.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePraisonAI and praisonaiagents contain a critical arbitrary command/code execution vulnerability in the workflow engine. When loading YAML files with type: job, the JobWorkflowExecutor directly executes shell commands via run: (subprocess.run()), inline Python via script: (exec()), and full Python scripts via python: without any validation, sandboxing, or user confirmation. Attackers with ability to supply or influence workflow YAML files can achieve full host compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.5.140< 4.5.139CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed PraisonAI versionRun 'pip show praisonai' or 'pip show praisonaiagents' to see the installed version numberAffected if Version is below 4.5.139 for praisonai or below 1.5.140 for praisonaiagents
-
Identify workflow run usageSearch command history or scripts for 'praisonai workflow run' commands, especially with YAML file argumentsAffected if The 'praisonai workflow run' command is used to load YAML workflow files
-
Inspect YAML workflow files for job typeExamine YAML files loaded by workflow run commands for 'type: job' directive at the root levelAffected if YAML files contain 'type: job' which triggers JobWorkflowExecutor processing
-
Check for dangerous directives in YAML filesReview YAML workflow files for 'run:', 'script:', or 'python:' directives under the job configurationAffected if YAML files contain untrusted run:, script:, or python: directives that will be executed without validation
A user is affected if they run a praisonai or praisonaiagents version below 4.5.139/1.5.140 and use 'praisonai workflow run' to load YAML files containing type: job with run:, script:, or python: directives from untrusted sources
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.5.1404.5.139
Upgrade to PraisonAI version 4.5.139 or higher and praisonaiagents version 1.5.140 or higher. Additionally, implement strict validation of YAML workflow files and avoid processing untrusted YAML files in production environments.
PraisonAI version 4.5.139 or praisonaiagents version 1.5.140
- Check which package is installed (praisonai or praisonaiagents): pip show praisonaiagents || pip show praisonai
- If praisonaiagents is installed, upgrade to fixed version: pip install --upgrade praisonaiagents==1.5.140
- If praisonai is installed, upgrade to fixed version: pip install --upgrade praisonai==4.5.139
- Verify the upgrade was successful: pip show praisonaiagents (should show version 1.5.140) or pip show praisonai (should show version 4.5.139)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40288 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data