CVE-2026-44335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.6.32, the URL checking logic in PraisonAI has a logical flaw that could be bypassed by attackers, leading to SSRF attacks. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.32.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePraisonAI versions prior to 1.6.32 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability stemming from a logical flaw in the URL validation/checking logic. Attackers can bypass the implemented URL checks to make the application perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources, potentially exposing sensitive internal services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.6.32CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PraisonAI versionRun `pip show praisonaiagents` or `pip list | grep -i praison` to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version shown is earlier than 1.6.32 (e.g., 1.6.30, 1.6.0, etc.)
-
Locate the URL validation codeSearch the PraisonAI installation directory for files handling URL validation, typically in agent or tool configuration files that process external URLsAffected if The codebase contains URL-fetching functionality that validates user-supplied URLs
-
Verify URL-based features are accessibleCheck agent configuration files or environment settings for features that accept URLs (such as web fetch, file download, or API call tools)Affected if Agents or tools that make HTTP requests based on user input are enabled in the environment
-
Inspect URL validation logicExamine the URL validation function in the source code for the presence of allowlist/denylist checking and any obvious bypass logicAffected if The validation relies on incomplete checks that could be bypassed (e.g., missing DNS resolution verification, no restriction on internal IP ranges)
A user is affected if their installed PraisonAI version is earlier than 1.6.32 AND the environment has URL-fetching features enabled that rely on the vulnerable validation logic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.6.32
Upgrade PraisonAI to version 1.6.32 or later to obtain the patched URL validation logic.
1.6.32 or later
- Check the current installed version of PraisonAI by running: pip show praisonaiagents or pip list | grep praisonai
- Upgrade to version 1.6.32 or later using: pip install --upgrade praisonaiagents>=1.6.32
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running: pip show praisonaiagents and confirming the version is 1.6.32 or higher
- Test that the URL checking logic now properly validates and blocks malicious requests
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data