CVE-2026-35603
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClaude Code is an agentic coding tool. In versions prior to 2.1.75 on Windows, Claude Code loaded the system-wide default configuration from C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\managed-settings.json without validating directory ownership or access permissions. Because the ProgramData directory is writable by non-administrative users by default and the ClaudeCode subdirectory was not pre-created or access-restricted, a low-privileged local user could create this directory and place a malicious configuration file that would be automatically loaded for any user launching Claude Code on the same machine. Exploiting this would have required a shared multi-user Windows system and a victim user to launch Claude Code after the malicious configuration was placed. This issue has been fixed on version 2.1.75.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceClaude Code versions prior to 2.1.75 on Windows load a system-wide configuration file from C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\managed-settings.json without validating directory ownership. Since the ProgramData directory is writable by non-administrative users by default and Claude Code did not pre-create or protect this subdirectory, a low-privilege local attacker could create the directory and place a malicious configuration file that would execute for all users launching Claude Code on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.1.75CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Claude Code is installed on WindowsLook for Claude Code installation in common locations: C:\Program Files\Claude Code\, or check Start Menu for Claude Code, or look in C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Programs\Claude Code\Affected if Claude Code is not installed - not vulnerable. If installed, continue to version check.
-
Determine installed Claude Code versionRun 'Claude Code --version' or 'claude --version' from Command Prompt or PowerShell, or check the version in the executable properties (right-click claude.exe → Properties → Details → File version)Affected if Version is less than 2.1.75 - potentially vulnerable. Continue to directory check.
-
Verify the vulnerable configuration directory existsOpen File Explorer and navigate to C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\ or run 'dir C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode' in Command PromptAffected if The directory C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\ does NOT exist - not vulnerable (prerequisite for exploit is missing). If directory EXISTS, continue to file check.
-
Check for the managed-settings.json configuration fileRun 'dir C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\managed-settings.json' or manually check if the file exists in that directoryAffected if The file managed-settings.json does NOT exist - not vulnerable (exploit requires this file). If file EXISTS, check permissions.
-
Inspect directory and file permissionsRight-click the ClaudeCode folder in ProgramData, go to Properties → Security tab. Check if non-admin users have Write or Modify permissions. Or run 'icacls C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode'Affected if Non-administrative users have Write or Modify access to the directory - vulnerable to privilege escalation attack
User is affected if Claude Code version is below 2.1.75 AND the C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\ directory exists with a managed-settings.json file that can be written by low-privilege users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.75
Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.75 or later. On shared multi-user systems, verify that no unauthorized configuration files exist in C:\ProgramData\ClaudeCode\ and consider implementing access controls on that directory.
Claude Code 2.1.75
- Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.75 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by launching Claude Code
- Confirm that the application loads configuration from a secure, validated location
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-35603 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-35603 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data