CVE-2026-44856
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in several underlying management service components accessed through the command-line interface of the AOS-8 and AOS-10 Operating Systems. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending specially crafted requests to the affected services. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in multiple management service components accessed via the CLI of Aruba AOS-8 and AOS-10 operating systems. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges can send specially crafted requests to trigger the overflow, achieving arbitrary code execution with elevated (root) privileges on the underlying OS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.5.4.0, < 8.10.0.22>= 8.11.0.0, < 8.12.0.7>= 8.13.0.0, < 8.13.1.2>= 10.4.0.0, < 10.4.1.11>= 10.5.0.0, < 10.7.2.3>= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.0, <= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7>= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0, <= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ArubaOS versionExecute 'show version' or 'show system info' from the CLI and note the software version numberAffected if The version falls within >= 6.5.4.0 and < 8.10.0.22, OR >= 8.11.0.0 and < 8.12.0.7, OR >= 8.13.0.0 and < 8.13.1.2, OR >= 10.4.0.0 and < 10.4.1.11, OR >= 10.5.0.0 and < 10.7.2.3
-
Identify installed SD-WAN versionExecute 'show version' or 'show sd-wan version' from the CLI and note the software version numberAffected if The version is >= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.0 and <= 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7, OR >= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.0 and <= 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9
-
Verify management access configurationExecute 'show management' or review the running configuration for management service settings (HTTP/HTTPS/SSH/Telnet) and which interfaces/IPs are permittedAffected if The CLI management interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the management VLAN is not properly isolated
-
Confirm administrative user accessExecute 'show privilege' or 'show user' to list administrative accounts and their privilege levelsAffected if Multiple administrative accounts exist with root-level privileges, especially any unexpected or unrecognized accounts
Your environment is affected if the installed ArubaOS or SD-WAN version matches any of the affected ranges AND the CLI is accessible to authenticated administrative users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.10.0.228.12.0.78.13.1.2
Apply vendor-provided patches for AOS-8 and AOS-10 once available. Until then, limit CLI access to trusted, administrative users only and monitor for signs of exploitation.
ArubaOS: 8.10.0.22 (for legacy 6.5-8.9 branch), 8.12.0.7 (for 8.11 branch), 8.13.1.2 (for 8.13 branch), or 10.4.1.11 (for 10.4 branch) | SD-WAN: >8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7 or >8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9
- Identify the current ArubaOS or SD-WAN version by running 'show version' in the CLI
- Determine which version branch your current installation falls into (6.5.x-8.9.x, 8.10.x, 8.11.x, 8.13.x, or 10.4.x for ArubaOS; 8.6.x or 8.7.x for SD-WAN)
- For ArubaOS 6.5.4.x through 8.9.x: Plan upgrade to minimum fixed version 8.10.0.22
- For ArubaOS 8.11.x: Plan upgrade to minimum fixed version 8.12.0.7
- For ArubaOS 8.13.x: Plan upgrade to minimum fixed version 8.13.1.2
- For ArubaOS 10.4.x: Plan upgrade to minimum fixed version 10.4.1.11
- For SD-WAN 8.6.0.4-2.2.x: Upgrade to a version newer than 8.6.0.4-2.2.0.7
- For SD-WAN 8.7.0.0-2.3.x: Upgrade to a version newer than 8.7.0.0-2.3.0.9
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,136.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44856 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44856 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data