Claude CodeApplication · Anthropic

CVE-2026-46406

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.128 or later.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Claude Code is an agentic coding tool. From 2.1.59 until 2.1.128, the Claude Code /copy command wrote responses to a hardcoded, predictable path (/tmp/claude/response.md) without UID isolation, randomness, or symlink protection. The file was created world-readable (0644) in a world-traversable directory (0755), allowing any local user to read a privileged user's Claude response, which could contain secrets or credentials. Additionally, because the path was static and predictable, a local attacker could pre-create the directory and plant a symlink at the expected file path, causing the privileged process to follow the symlink and overwrite an attacker-chosen file with the response text. Exploiting this required a local unprivileged user on the same system and a privileged user to run the /copy command. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.128.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Claude Code versions 2.1.59 through 2.1.128 have a path traversal and information disclosure vulnerability in the /copy command, which writes responses to a hardcoded predictable path (/tmp/claude/response.md) with world-readable permissions (0644) in a world-traversable directory (0755), allowing any local unprivileged user to read potentially sensitive response content or pre-plant symlinks to overwrite attacker-chosen files.

MitigationUpgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.128 or later, which implements proper UID isolation, randomness, and symlink protection for the response file path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Claude CodeApplication
Affected:>= 2.1.58, < 2.1.128

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Claude Code version
    Run 'claude --version' or check the binary/package version. Compare against the affected range: 2.1.59 through 2.1.128
    Affected if Version is >= 2.1.58 and < 2.1.128 (or 2.1.59 through 2.1.127)
  2. Check if vulnerable output file exists
    Inspect /tmp/claude/response.md with 'ls -la /tmp/claude/response.md'
    Affected if File exists at the hardcoded path /tmp/claude/response.md
  3. Verify file permissions are insecure
    Run 'stat -c '%a' /tmp/claude/response.md' to check the octal permissions
    Affected if Permissions are 0644 (world-readable)
  4. Verify directory permissions allow traversal
    Run 'stat -c '%a' /tmp/claude/' to check the directory mode
    Affected if Directory mode is 0755 (world-traversable)

User is affected if Claude Code version is between 2.1.59 and 2.1.128 AND the /tmp/claude/response.md file exists with world-readable permissions in a world-traversable directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.128 or later
Fixed in 2.1.128
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.128 or later, which implements proper UID isolation, randomness, and symlink protection for the response file path.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.1.128

  1. Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.128 or later to remediate this vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Claude Code Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46406 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46406 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data