CVE-2026-50631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA race condition in AbstractOAuthDataProvider allows concurrent requests using the same Refresh Token to bypass single-use semantics and generate multiple valid Access Tokens, when 'recycleRefreshTokens' is set to false. A leaked refresh token can be replayed concurrently by multiple attackers or threads. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in AbstractOAuthDataProvider allows concurrent requests using the same Refresh Token to bypass single-use semantics and generate multiple valid Access Tokens when 'recycleRefreshTokens' is set to false. The vulnerability occurs because the refresh token validation and invalidation are not performed atomically, allowing multiple threads to obtain valid access tokens before the token is marked as used.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.1.7>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache CXF versionLocate the CXF JAR files in your application (typically in WEB-INF/lib or classpath) or check your build configuration (pom.xml, build.gradle) for the cxf-core or cxf-rt-oauth2 artifact versionAffected if The installed version is < 4.1.7 OR >= 4.2.0 and < 4.2.2
-
Verify OAuth2 provider is in useSearch your codebase or configuration for classes extending AbstractOAuthDataProvider or configuring OAuth2 providers, such as looking for XML configuration files with OAuth2 provider beans or Java-based OAuth provider configurationAffected if Your application uses Apache CXF's OAuth2 implementation with AbstractOAuthDataProvider
-
Check recycleRefreshTokens configurationExamine your OAuth2 provider configuration (often in application context XML files or configuration properties) for the recycleRefreshTokens settingAffected if recycleRefreshTokens is explicitly set to false or not set (defaults to false in vulnerable configurations)
-
Inspect token refresh endpoint exposureReview your web service configuration to confirm the /oauth/token or refresh endpoint is exposed and accessibleAffected if Your application exposes an OAuth2 token refresh endpoint that accepts refresh tokens
You are affected if you run a vulnerable CXF version (4.2.0-4.2.1 or <4.1.7) with OAuth2 using AbstractOAuthDataProvider where recycleRefreshTokens is set to false.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.1.74.2.2
Upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 which contain the fix for this race condition. Until upgraded, monitor for suspicious concurrent token refresh attempts using the same credentials.
4.2.2 or 4.1.7 (depending on current version branch)
- Identify the current CXF version in use by checking project dependencies (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or library management system)
- Determine which upgrade path applies: if current version is < 4.1.7, upgrade to 4.1.7; if current version is >= 4.2.0 and < 4.2.2, upgrade to 4.2.2
- Update the dependency version in your build configuration (e.g., change org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-oauth2 to version 4.1.7 or 4.2.2)
- Run build and automated tests to verify compatibility with the new version
- Deploy the upgraded version to production after validation in staging
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-50631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-50631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data