CVE-2026-55607
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedClaude Code is an agentic coding tool. From 2.1.38 until 2.1.163, Claude Code's worktree handling allowed creation of worktrees named ".git" and navigation to worktrees outside the sandbox context, enabling git directory confusion attacks. By exploiting symlink manipulation and git fsmonitor execution during worktree operations, an attacker could overwrite files in the user's home directory (such as .zshenv), leading to code execution outside of seatbelt sandbox restrictions. Reliably exploiting this required the user to clone a malicious repository containing prompt injection content and run Claude Code against it. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.163.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceClaude Code versions 2.1.38-2.1.163 contained a sandbox escape vulnerability in worktree handling that allowed creation of worktrees named '.git' and navigation outside the sandbox context via symlink manipulation. Attackers could exploit git fsmonitor execution during worktree operations to overwrite files like .zshenv in the user's home directory, achieving code execution outside seatbelt restrictions when users cloned and ran Claude Code against malicious repositories.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.1.38, < 2.1.163CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Claude Code versionRun 'claude --version' or check the application's About/info panel to identify the exact version numberAffected if The version is 2.1.38 through 2.1.163 inclusive
-
Verify worktree operations have occurredCheck for any worktree-related directories or git operations: look for .git worktree refs or check git worktree list output in any repositories you have worked withAffected if Worktrees were created or manipulated, particularly with names like '.git' or via symlinks
-
Inspect home directory for unauthorized modificationsReview .zshenv, .bashrc, .profile, and other shell initialization files in your home directory for unexpected additions or modificationsAffected if These files contain suspicious content you did not add, especially if they execute commands from unexpected locations
-
Check for suspicious worktree directoriesLook for worktree directories named '.git' or directories containing symlinks that point outside expected repository boundariesAffected if Such directories or symlinks exist in your working repositories
You are affected if Claude Code version 2.1.38-2.1.163 is installed AND you have cloned or run Claude Code against untrusted repositories where worktree operations occurred.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.163
Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.163 or later. Avoid cloning or running Claude Code against untrusted repositories.
2.1.163
- Check current Claude Code version by running: claude --version
- Upgrade Claude Code to version 2.1.163 or later by downloading the latest release from the official Anthropic Claude Code releases page
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running: claude --version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-55607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-55607 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data