CVE-2026-57219
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, the obsolete GET /api/auth endpoint can disclose the OAuth 2 client secret on RabbitMQ installations configured with management.oauth_client_secret, exposing credentials to unauthenticated callers when the management plugin and that OAuth configuration are enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe obsolete GET /api/auth endpoint in RabbitMQ exposes the OAuth 2 client secret (management.oauth_client_secret) to unauthenticated callers when the management plugin with OAuth configuration is enabled. This credential disclosure allows attackers to potentially obtain valid OAuth credentials for further attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.13.0, < 4.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check RabbitMQ server versionRun `rabbitmqctl version` or `rabbitmqctl status` and locate the version string in the outputAffected if Version is 3.13.0 or higher but lower than 4.2.6
-
Verify management plugin is enabledRun `rabbitmqctl list_plugins` and confirm the management plugin shows as enabledAffected if The management plugin is listed as enabled (marked with [E])
-
Inspect for OAuth client secret configurationExamine the RabbitMQ configuration files (rabbitmq.conf, advanced.config, or conf.d/*.conf) for the setting `management.oauth_client_secret`Affected if The configuration contains a management.oauth_client_secret value (regardless of its content)
-
Test unauthenticated access to /api/auth endpointSend a GET request to the management plugin endpoint: `curl -s http://localhost:15672/api/auth` (or the configured management port) without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if The endpoint responds with any HTTP 200 or 401 (meaning it's accessible without authentication) and potentially exposes the OAuth client secret in the response body
User is affected if RabbitMQ version is in the range 3.13.0 to 4.2.5, the management plugin is enabled, OAuth configuration with management.oauth_client_secret is present, and the /api/auth endpoint responds to unauthenticated requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.6
Upgrade RabbitMQ to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, or 4.2.6 or later to patch the vulnerable endpoint. Until upgrade is possible, disable the management plugin or ensure the management.oauth_client_secret configuration is not in use.
Upgrade to RabbitMQ Server 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, or 4.2.6 depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify current RabbitMQ server version using 'rabbitmq-diagnostics status' or checking package manager
- 2. Determine appropriate upgrade target based on current version branch (3.13.x -> 3.13.15, 4.0.x -> 4.0.20, 4.1.x -> 4.1.11, 4.2.x -> 4.2.6)
- 3. Backup RabbitMQ configuration files (rabbitmq.conf, advanced.conf, enabled plugins)
- 4. Stop RabbitMQ service before upgrade
- 5. Upgrade RabbitMQ Server to the appropriate fixed version via package manager or binary release
- 6. Start RabbitMQ service after upgrade completes
- 7. Verify the fix by confirming the GET /api/auth endpoint no longer returns the OAuth client secret
- 8. If using management.oauth_client_secret, verify OAuth authentication still functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57219 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57219 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data