CVE-2009-2319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe default configuration of the Wi-Fi component on the Axesstel MV 410R does not use encryption, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Axesstel MV 410R router ships with Wi-Fi encryption disabled by default, leaving the wireless network open. Any attacker within radio range can use standard packet sniffing tools to capture unencrypted network traffic and intercept sensitive data such as credentials, session tokens, or personal information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Access the router's web interfaceOpen a web browser and navigate to the router's default IP address (typically 192.168.1.1 or 192.168.0.1). Log in with the default administrator credentials (consult your router documentation if needed).Affected if N/A - this is the first step to perform the check
-
Locate the wireless security settingsIn the router's web interface, navigate to the Wireless or WLAN settings section. Look for submenus named 'Security', 'Wireless Security', 'Encryption', or similar.Affected if N/A - this navigates to the relevant configuration area
-
Check the wireless encryption statusIn the wireless security settings, identify the 'Security Mode', 'Encryption', or 'Authentication' field. Determine whether it shows any encryption type (WPA2, WPA3, WEP) or displays as 'Open', 'Disabled', or 'None'.Affected if The security mode is set to 'Open', 'Disabled', 'None', or no encryption is enabled - this means the wireless network is unencrypted and vulnerable
-
Confirm the network is accessible without a passwordFrom a wireless client device, scan for available networks and attempt to connect to the router's SSID without entering any password. If the connection succeeds without authentication, the network is open.Affected if The wireless network accepts connections without requiring a password or encryption key
A user is affected if the Axesstel MV 410R router has wireless encryption disabled, resulting in an open/unsecured Wi-Fi network that allows unauthenticated access by anyone within radio range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable WPA2 or WPA3 encryption on the router's wireless settings, along with a strong pre-shared key, and disable WPS to prevent brute-force attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data