CVE-2010-1428
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Web Console (aka web-console) in JBossAs in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.2 before 4.2.0.CP09 and 4.3 before 4.3.0.CP08 performs access control only for the GET and POST methods, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an unspecified request that uses a different method.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe JBoss Web Console performs access control checks only for GET and POST HTTP methods. Attackers can bypass authentication by using other HTTP methods (such as HEAD, OPTIONS, PUT, DELETE) to access sensitive administrative information without credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.2.0= 4.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss EAP installation and versionLocate the JBoss installation directory and check the version file (typically in $JBOSS_HOME/readme.txt or check jar manifest files in lib directory). Alternatively, run: java -jar $JBOSS_HOME/bin/jboss-version.jar or check server/release.infoAffected if The installed version is 4.2.0.x before CP09 or 4.3.0.x before CP08 (including unpatched 4.2.0 or 4.3.0 base releases)
-
Determine if Web Console is deployedCheck for the presence of the web-console.war or jmx-console.war deployment in $JBOSS_HOME/server/all/deploy/ or the default deploy directory. Also check if these console URLs are accessible: http://localhost:8080/web-console/ or http://localhost:8080/jmx-console/Affected if The Web Console (web-console.war or jmx-console.war) is deployed and network-accessible
-
Verify HTTP method handling configurationReview the WEB-INF/web.xml descriptor inside the deployed web-console.war (located at $JBOSS_HOME/server/all/deploy/http-invoker.sar/web-console.war/WEB-INF/web.xml or similar path) for security constraint definitions. Check if <http-method> elements are limited to only GET and POSTAffected if The security constraint specifies only GET and POST methods (or omits method constraints entirely in a way that leaves other methods unrestricted)
If JBoss EAP version 4.2.0 through 4.2.0.CP08 or 4.3.0 through 4.3.0.CP07 is running with the Web Console deployed and accessible, the environment is vulnerable to authentication bypass via non-GET/POST HTTP methods.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade JBoss EAP to version 4.2.0.CP09 or 4.3.0.CP08 or later which includes the patched web-console. Alternatively, disable the web console if not required or restrict network access to the console via firewall rules.
JBoss EAP 4.2.0.CP09 (for 4.2.x) or JBoss EAP 4.3.0.CP08 (for 4.3.x)
- Identify the current JBoss EAP version by checking the version string in the JBoss startup logs or the jbossas/version.properties file
- Download the appropriate patch from the Red Hat Customer Portal: JBoss EAP 4.2.0.CP09 for 4.2.x or JBoss EAP 4.3.0.CP08 for 4.3.x
- Stop the JBoss EAP instance gracefully
- Apply the patch following Red Hat's standard patch application process for CP (Critical Patch) updates
- Verify the patch was applied by checking the version shows 4.2.0.CP09 or 4.3.0.CP08
- Restart the JBoss EAP instance
- Test that the web console is accessible and that HTTP methods other than GET and POST are now properly restricted
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-1428 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-1428 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data