CVE-2017-7465
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIt was found that the JAXP implementation used in JBoss EAP 7.0 for XSLT processing is vulnerable to code injection. An attacker could use this flaw to cause remote code execution if they are able to provide XSLT content for parsing. Doing a transform in JAXP requires the use of a 'javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory'. If the FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING feature is set to 'true', it mitigates this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJBoss EAP 7.0 contains a code injection vulnerability in its JAXP implementation for XSLT processing. Attackers who can supply XSLT content for parsing can achieve remote code execution by exploiting the javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory. The vulnerability is mitigated by enabling the FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING feature.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss EAP versionRun 'jboss-cli.sh --version' or check the product.conf file in $JBOSS_HOME/bin to confirm the installed version is 7.0.0Affected if The installed JBoss EAP version is exactly 7.0.0
-
Locate XSLT processing codeSearch deployed applications for usage of javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory, javax.xml.transform.Templates, or related XSLT classes in JSP, servlet, or Java deployment archivesAffected if Applications deployed on the server perform XSLT transformations using TransformerFactory
-
Inspect TransformerFactory configurationReview application source code and configuration files for TransformerFactory instantiation - look for new javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory calls and check if setAttribute("http://javax.xml.XMLConstants/feature/secure-processing", true) or equivalent is calledAffected if TransformerFactory instances are created without FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING enabled via setAttribute or system property
-
Check system property configurationExamine jboss startup scripts (standalone.conf or domain.conf) and application deployment descriptors for the system property javax.xml.XMLConstants.FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING being set to trueAffected if The secure processing feature is not enabled via system property or programmatically on the TransformerFactory
You are affected if you run JBoss EAP 7.0.0 and have applications that perform XSLT transformations using TransformerFactory without FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEnable FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING on all javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory instances used for XSLT parsing to prevent code injection attacks.
JBoss EAP 7.0.1 or later (or migrate to newer EAP 7.x line such as 7.4)
- Locate the javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory usage in the application's code that processes XSLT
- Add the following security feature to the TransformerFactory before processing any XSLT: transformerFactory.setFeature(XMLConstants.FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING, true)
- Alternatively, set the system property: System.setProperty(XMLConstants.FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING, "true")
- If using Saxon or other third-party XSLT processors, ensure FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING is enabled for those as well
- Verify that external entity (XXE) protection is working by testing with malicious XML/XSLT input
- Consult JBoss EAP documentation for application-specific XML parser configuration
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7465 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data