CVE-2010-1871
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJBoss Seam 2 (jboss-seam2), as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0 for Red Hat Linux, does not properly sanitize inputs for JBoss Expression Language (EL) expressions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted URL. NOTE: this is only a vulnerability when the Java Security Manager is not properly configured.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJBoss Seam 2 fails to properly sanitize user inputs containing Expression Language (EL) syntax, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary Java code via crafted URLs. This EL injection vulnerability permits remote code execution on the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.3.0all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss Seam 2 installationSearch for seam*.jar files in the application deployment directory or check the application manifest for Seam 2 dependenciesAffected if JBoss Seam 2 is present in the deployment
-
Check JBoss EAP versionRun 'jboss-admin.sh' or check version.txt in the JBoss installation directory, or inspect the server startup logs for the exact EAP version numberAffected if The installed version is Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0
-
Check NetApp OnCommand product installationsIdentify any installed Netapp Oncommand Balance, Oncommand Insight, or Oncommand Unified Manager instances in the environmentAffected if Any version of these NetApp products is installed (they are all affected)
-
Verify Java Security Manager configurationCheck if the Java Security Manager is enabled by looking for -security flag in startup scripts or checking the conf/login-config.xml policy fileAffected if Java Security Manager is not properly configured or is disabled
A user is affected if they run JBoss Seam 2 or JBoss EAP 4.3.0 or any NetApp OnCommand product without a properly configured Java Security Manager, allowing EL injection via crafted URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedConfigure the Java Security Manager properly to enforce security policies that block unauthorized EL expression execution; alternatively, upgrade to a patched version of JBoss Seam/JBoss EAP if available.
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.x or later with JBoss Seam 2.2.1+ (consult Red Hat for specific compatible versions)
- Ensure the Java Security Manager is properly configured for the JBoss application. Review and enforce the security policy files to restrict EL expression evaluation.
- If Java Security Manager configuration is not feasible, consider upgrading to a JBoss Enterprise Application Platform version that includes a fixed JBoss Seam 2 release ( Seam 2.2.1 or later).
- For Oncommand products (Balance, Insight, Unified Manager), contact the vendor (NetApp) for specific patches or upgrade paths, as these products bundle the vulnerable JBoss Seam component.
- Implement web application firewall (WAF) rules to filter suspicious patterns in URL parameters that may contain EL expressions (e.g., ${, #{, etc.).
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-1871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-1871 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data