Data ProtectorApplication · Hp

CVE-2011-0921

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-02-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
crs.exe in the Cell Manager Service in the client in HP Data Protector does not properly validate credentials associated with the hostname, domain, and username, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending unspecified data over TCP, related to the webreporting client, the applet domain, and the java username.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

crs.exe in HP Data Protector Cell Manager Service fails to properly validate credentials associated with hostname, domain, and username. This authentication bypass allows remote attackers to send specially crafted TCP data to execute arbitrary code, particularly through the webreporting client, applet domain, and java username components.

MitigationApply HP Data Protector security patches or upgrade to a patched version. Restrict network access to Cell Manager Service ports and disable the webreporting client component if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Data ProtectorApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if HP Data Protector is installed
    Check for HP Data Protector installation directory (commonly at C:\Program Files\HP\Data Protector or C:\Program Files\OmniBack) and look for bin\crs.exe
    Affected if HP Data Protector with crs.exe exists on the system
  2. Verify the Cell Manager Service (crs.exe) is running
    Open Task Manager or use command 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq crs.exe"' to check if crs.exe process is active
    Affected if crs.exe process is running - this is the vulnerable component
  3. Check if webreporting client is enabled
    Inspect HP Data Protector configuration files (typically in etc\opt\omni\cell\server\config or similar) for webreporting or webclient settings, or check Windows Services for 'HP Data Protector Web Reporting' service
    Affected if Webreporting client component is enabled and accessible
  4. Verify network exposure of Cell Manager Service
    Check listening ports on the system using 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' looking for typical HP Data Protector ports (typically 5555, 5565, or 8080 for webreporting)
    Affected if Cell Manager Service ports are exposed to untrusted networks rather than isolated internally
  5. Review Cell Manager configuration for authentication settings
    Examine configuration files in the HP Data Protector etc directory for authentication-related settings in the crs or cell manager configuration
    Affected if Configuration allows unauthenticated or improperly validated remote connections

The system is affected if HP Data Protector with crs.exe is installed and running with webreporting or the Cell Manager Service exposed to network access, since the vulnerability allows authentication bypass via specially crafted TCP data to the crs.exe service.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply HP Data Protector security patches or upgrade to a patched version. Restrict network access to Cell Manager Service ports and disable the webreporting client component if not required.

Fix this in Data Protector Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2011-0921 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2011-0921 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data