CVE-2017-5807
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Remote Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability in HPE Data Protector version prior to 8.17 and 9.09 was found.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHPE Data Protector contains a remote arbitrary code execution vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 8.17 and 9.09, likely due to insufficient input validation or authentication bypass in the backup/protection service components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.17= 9.09CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HPE Data Protector installationLocate the HPE Data Protector installation directory and look for version information in the installation folder, or use system inventory tools that enumerate installed HP/HPE software.Affected if Data Protector is installed and the version cannot be confirmed as 8.17 or later, or version 9.09 is confirmed.
-
Retrieve exact Data Protector versionCheck the Data Protector version using the 'omnidbutil -version' command from the Data Protector bin directory, or examine the 'omnicc -version' output if available.Affected if The reported version is lower than 8.17, or equals exactly 9.09.
-
Verify Data Protector services are activeCheck if the Data Protector services (such as HP Data Protector Inet, HP Data Protector Cell Manager, or related services) are running on the system using 'sc query' on Windows or 'service status' commands on Linux.Affected if Data Protector services are running and the version check in step 2 confirms an affected version.
-
Assess network exposure of Data Protector portsReview open ports and listening services to determine if Data Protector management or backup ports (commonly TCP 5555, 5556, 5562, or as configured) are exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if Data Protector services are listening on accessible network interfaces and the version is in the affected range.
The environment is affected if HPE Data Protector is installed with a version lower than 8.17 or exactly version 9.09, and the Data Protector services are running and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.17
Upgrade HPE Data Protector to version 8.17 or 9.09 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to Data Protector services and implement additional network segmentation.
HPE Data Protector 8.17 or 9.09 (or later)
- 1. Back up your Data Protector configuration and database before initiating any upgrade
- 2. Download HPE Data Protector version 8.17 or version 9.09 (or later) from the HPE Support Center (support.hpe.com)
- 3. Review the HPE Data Protector upgrade guide for your current version to ensure compatibility
- 4. Stop all Data Protector services on the cell server and clients
- 5. Upgrade the Data Protector cell server first, following the HPE installation/upgrade documentation
- 6. Upgrade all Data Protector clients to the same version to maintain compatibility
- 7. Restart Data Protector services after the upgrade completes
- 8. Verify the Data Protector services are running correctly and the version shows as 8.17 or 9.09 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-5807 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-5807 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data