CVE-2016-2008
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHPE Data Protector before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHPE Data Protector contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability affecting versions before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06. The vulnerability is network-exploitable, requires no authentication, and can be exploited via unspecified vectors to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0, < 7.03_108>= 8.0, < 8.15>= 9.0, < 9.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HPE Data Protector versionLocate the HPE Data Protector installation on the system and retrieve the installed version number. Common methods include checking the installation directory (typically /opt/HP or C:\HP on Windows), running product-specific commands such as 'omniversion' or 'omniina -version' if available, or viewing version information in the Data Protector about panel if the client interface is accessible.Affected if The installed version is 7.0 or higher but below 7.03_108, or 8.0 or higher but below 8.15, or 9.0 or higher but below 9.06
-
Check if Data Protector services are runningIdentify whether any HPE Data Protector services or processes are actively running on the system. Use system commands such as 'ps aux' on Unix/Linux or check Services on Windows to locate processes like omniback, OmniBack, or Data Protector related services.Affected if Data Protector services are currently running on the system
-
Determine network exposure of Data ProtectorReview network configuration to determine if Data Protector services are listening on network interfaces accessible from outside the local system. Check for open ports associated with Data Protector (commonly ports 5555, 5565, or similar HP/OmniBack ports) using netstat or similar network tools.Affected if Data Protector services are bound to network interfaces accessible from untrusted networks
A system is affected if it runs HPE Data Protector version 7.0 through 7.03_107, 8.0 through 8.14, or 9.0 through 9.05 with network-accessible services.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.03_1088.159.06
Upgrade HPE Data Protector to version 7.03_108, 8.15, or 9.06 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to Data Protector services and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.
Upgrade to HPE Data Protector 7.03_108 (for 7.x), 8.15 (for 8.x), or 9.06 (for 9.x) - choose the appropriate branch based on your current major version
- 1. Verify the current HPE Data Protector installation version using the omnisv -version or omniversion command
- 2. Based on your current major version (7.x, 8.x, or 9.x), plan the upgrade to the minimum fixed release
- 3. For version 7.x: upgrade to 7.03_108 or later
- 4. For version 8.x: upgrade to 8.15 or later
- 5. For version 9.x: upgrade to 9.06 or later
- 6. Obtain the upgrade installer from HPE Support (hpe.com/support) or your authorized HPE representative
- 7. Review HPE Data Protector upgrade documentation for prerequisites and migration considerations
- 8. Perform a full backup of Data Protector configuration and database before upgrading
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2008 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2008 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data