CVE-2014-0248
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedorg.jboss.seam.web.AuthenticationFilter in Red Hat JBoss Web Framework Kit 2.5.0, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBEAP) 5.2.0, and JBoss Enterprise Web Platform (JBEWP) 5.2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted authentication header, related to Seam logging.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe org.jboss.seam.web.AuthenticationFilter in JBoss Seam-based products (JBoss Web Framework Kit 2.5.0, JBEAP 5.2.0, JBEWP 5.2.0) does not properly sanitize authentication headers before passing them to the Seam logging framework, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary code through crafted authentication headers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0= 5.2.0= 2.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed JBoss product and versionCheck the version of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Web Platform, or JBoss Web Framework Kit installed in your environment. Look for version files or use system inventory tools to determine the exact version number.Affected if The installed version matches 5.2.0 for JBEAP or JBEWP, or 2.5.0 for JBoss Web Framework Kit.
-
Locate the AuthenticationFilter classSearch for the org.jboss.seam.web.AuthenticationFilter class in the deployed application binaries or JBoss libraries. This class is part of the JBoss Seam framework.Affected if The AuthenticationFilter class exists in your deployment and is from an affected JBoss Seam version.
-
Check web.xml for AuthenticationFilter configurationInspect the web.xml deployment descriptor (typically in WEB-INF/web.xml or conf/web.xml) for a filter definition and mapping referencing org.jboss.seam.web.AuthenticationFilter.Affected if The AuthenticationFilter is configured and enabled in the web.xml.
-
Inspect authentication header processingReview the Seam logging configuration and any custom authentication code that processes HTTP headers. Look for places where authentication headers (such as X-Forwarded-For, Authorization, or custom headers) are passed to logging methods without sanitization.Affected if Authentication headers are logged or processed by the Seam framework without input validation.
-
Verify external header injection is possibleTest whether external user-supplied authentication headers can be injected into logs by sending crafted requests with special characters in authentication-related headers.Affected if The application passes unsanitized authentication headers to the logging framework, allowing log injection.
You are affected if you are running JBEAP 5.2.0, JBEWP 5.2.0, or JBoss Web Framework Kit 2.5.0 with the AuthenticationFilter enabled and authentication headers being logged without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches from Red Hat for the affected JBoss Enterprise platforms, or implement header validation at a reverse proxy/WAF layer to filter malicious authentication headers before they reach the application.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2014-0248 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2014-0248 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data