CVE-2016-2007
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHPE Data Protector before 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-3354.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHPE Data Protector contains a critical vulnerability allowing remote code execution. The vulnerability affects versions prior to 7.03_108, 8.x before 8.15, and 9.x before 9.06. The specific attack vector is not detailed in available sources, but the CVSS 9.8 score indicates trivial exploitability with total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0, < 7.03_108>= 8.0, < 8.15>= 9.0, < 9.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate HPE Data Protector installationIdentify where HPE Data Protector is installed on the system. Common locations include C:\Program Files\HPE\Data Protector on Windows or /opt/HP on Linux. Check for the presence of the Data Protector client or server binaries.Affected if HPE Data Protector software is found on the system
-
Determine installed versionRun the version command specific to HPE Data Protector. On Windows, right-click the Data Protector icon and select 'About' or check Add/Remove Programs. On Linux, check /opt/HP/Data Protector/version.txt or run 'omn version' if available. Note the full version string including build number.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or the version string is incomplete
-
Compare version against affected rangesMatch the installed version to the vulnerable ranges: 7.0 to 7.03_107, 8.0 to 8.14, or 9.0 to 9.05. The third segment of the version number indicates the patch level. For example, 7.03_106 is vulnerable while 7.03_108 is not.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 7.0 and < 7.03_108; >= 8.0 and < 8.15; >= 9.0 and < 9.06
-
Verify service exposureCheck if the Data Protector services are listening on network ports. Common ports include 5555 (OMS), 5556, and other service-specific ports. Use 'netstat -an' or a port scanner to identify exposed Data Protector services.Affected if Data Protector services are listening on accessible network ports and the version is vulnerable
The environment is affected if HPE Data Protector is installed and the version falls within 7.0 to 7.03_107, 8.0 to 8.14, or 9.0 to 9.05.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.03_1088.159.06
Upgrade HPE Data Protector to version 7.03_108, 8.15, 9.06 or later. Given the critical severity and remote code execution capability, prioritize patching and verify the upgrade in a staging environment before production deployment.
HPE Data Protector 7.03_108 (7.x branch), 8.15 (8.x branch), or 9.06 (9.x branch)
- Identify current HPE Data Protector version by checking the installation or running version query commands
- Backup all critical Data Protector configuration, databases, and client data per HPE best practices
- Download the appropriate HPE Data Protector patch/upgrade from HPE support portal (hpe.com) - choose: 7.03_108 or later for 7.x, 8.15 or later for 8.x, or 9.06 or later for 9.x
- Review HPE Data Protector upgrade/install documentation for your specific version path
- Execute the upgrade using HPE's standard installation procedure (typically via the installer or HP DP command-line tools)
- Verify successful upgrade by confirming the new version number matches the target fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2007 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2007 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data