CVE-2016-3690
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe PooledInvokerServlet in JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized payload.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe PooledInvokerServlet in JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x is vulnerable to Java deserialization attacks. Attackers can send crafted serialized Java objects that, when deserialized by the servlet, allow remote code execution on the target system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.2.0= 4.3.0= 5.0.0= 5.1.0= 5.1.1= 5.1.2= 5.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JBoss EAP installation and versionCheck for JBoss installation directories (often under /opt/jboss, /usr/share/jboss, or similar). Locate version info in README.txt, docs, or server/../bin/run.conf. On Windows, check installed programs or the jbossas/bin directory.Affected if The installed version matches 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 5.0.0, 5.1.0, 5.1.1, 5.1.2, or 5.2.0
-
Locate the PooledInvokerServletSearch for 'PooledInvoker' in the deployment directory (typically server/all/deploy or server/default/deploy). Look for files named invoker.war, jboss-invoker.sar, or similar invoker deployments containing PooledInvoker classes.Affected if The PooledInvoker servlet is present in the deployment directory
-
Verify PooledInvoker HTTP endpoint is accessibleCheck if the invoker servlet is exposed via web.xml mappings. Test access to common paths such as /invoker/PooledInvokerServlet, /invoker/, or custom configured paths. Use a web scanner or curl to probe these endpoints.Affected if The PooledInvoker endpoint is mapped and reachable over the network
-
Check for deserialization filters or protectionsInspect jbossweb.jar or server configuration for Java deserialization filter settings. Review java.io.ObjectInputStream usage and any custom security manager configurations.Affected if No deserialization filters are configured and the vulnerable servlet remains exposed
You are affected if you are running JBoss EAP 4.2.0 through 5.2.0 with the PooledInvokerServlet deployed and network-accessible, as this combination allows the deserialization attack to succeed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a supported, patched version of JBoss EAP (6.x or later). If upgrading is not immediately feasible, disable or remove the PooledInvokerServlet and restrict network access to the affected service.
JBoss EAP 7.x or 8.x (supported release)
- 1. Identify all JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x instances in the environment that have PooledInvokerServlet enabled
- 2. Plan migration from JBoss EAP 4.x/5.x to a supported version (JBoss EAP 7.x or 8.x)
- 3. Before upgrading, disable the PooledInvokerServlet as an interim mitigation by removing or commenting out the corresponding servlet configuration in the web.xml or jboss-web.xml
- 4. Alternatively, block access to the PooledInvokerServlet endpoint (typically /invoker/PooledInvokerServlet) at the network level or via a web application firewall
- 5. Perform upgrade to JBoss EAP 7.x or later which addresses this vulnerability
- 6. After upgrade, verify that the PooledInvoker component is either removed or properly secured
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-3690 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-3690 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data