CVE-2017-12358
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Jabber for Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf79080, CSCvf79088.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Jabber's web-based management interface. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious script through insufficiently validated user input, which executes when users access the affected interface, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in the browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 11.9\(0\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco Jabber installationCheck for Cisco Jabber installation by looking in standard program directories (Windows: C:\Program Files\Cisco Systems\Cisco Jabber or C:\Program Files (x86)\Cisco Systems\Cisco Jabber), or search for 'Jabber' in Add/Remove Programs. On Linux, check /opt/cisco/jabber or using package manager commands like dpkg -l | grep -i jabber or rpm -qa | grep -i jabber.Affected if Cisco Jabber software is found installed on the system
-
Determine installed Cisco Jabber versionOpen Cisco Jabber and navigate to Help > About, or check the Windows registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cisco Systems\Install\InstallDir for the path, then check the version.xml or version.txt in the installation directory. On Linux, run: /opt/cisco/jabber/jabber --versionAffected if The installed version matches any version of Cisco Jabber (the advisory indicates all versions are affected)
-
Verify web-based management interface is enabledAccess the web-based management interface by opening a browser and navigating to https://localhost:443 or the configured management port (default 443). Check Cisco Jabber configuration files (jabber-config.xml or config.xml in the installation directory) for webAdminEnabled or similar settings. On Windows, also check registry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cisco Systems\Cisco Jabber\AdminEnabledAffected if The web-based management interface is enabled and accessible (this is the attack vector for the XSS vulnerability)
-
Confirm network accessibility of management interfaceIf the web interface is locally enabled, verify if it is bound to external interfaces by checking the configuration for listenAddress or adminInterface settings. Test by attempting to access the interface from another host: https://<jabber-server-ip>:443/adminAffected if The web-based management interface is accessible over the network (increases exposure to remote attackers)
A user is affected if Cisco Jabber is installed and its web-based management interface is enabled and accessible, regardless of version since all versions are listed as affected.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco security updates for Cisco Jabber addressing CSCvf79080 and CSCvf79088. Until patches are applied, disable or restrict access to the web-based management interface and train users to avoid clicking untrusted links.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12358 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data