JabberApplication · Cisco

CVE-2018-0483

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-01-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in Cisco Jabber Client Framework (JCF) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input of an affected client. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing arbitrary JavaScript in the Jabber client of the recipient. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the targeted client or allow the attacker to access sensitive client-based information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Jabber Client Framework allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary JavaScript through insufficient validation of user-supplied input. The attack executes in the context of the victim's Jabber client, enabling access to sensitive client-based information.

MitigationApply the Cisco security patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco advisory) or upgrade to a patched version of Cisco Jabber. Until then, limit trust in authenticated Jabber communications and monitor for suspicious client activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JabberApplication
Affected:= 10.0\(0\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Cisco Jabber is installed
    Search for Cisco Jabber in system applications - check Program Files (Windows) or Applications folder (Mac), or look in the Windows registry under HKLM\Software\Cisco Systems\Cisco Jabber
    Affected if Cisco Jabber is not present on the system
  2. Identify installed Cisco Jabber version
    Open Cisco Jabber client and navigate to Help > About Cisco Jabber to view version information, or check the jabber-config.xml file, or query the Windows registry key HKLM\Software\Cisco Systems\Cisco Jabber\Version
    Affected if Unable to retrieve version information or Jabber is not running
  3. Compare version to affected release
    Verify the installed version matches 10.0(0) exactly as listed in the affected versions
    Affected if Installed version is 10.0(0) - this version is affected by the XSS vulnerability
  4. Assess authentication context
    Determine if users connect to Cisco Jabber servers (XIM, CUCM, or UDS) with authenticated sessions - the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker to inject malicious JavaScript
    Affected if Users have active authenticated Jabber sessions where untrusted or external contacts can send messages

Environment is affected if Cisco Jabber version 10.0(0) is installed and users maintain authenticated Jabber communications where malicious JavaScript could be injected through messages.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco security patch for this vulnerability (refer to Cisco advisory) or upgrade to a patched version of Cisco Jabber. Until then, limit trust in authenticated Jabber communications and monitor for suspicious client activity.

Fix this in Jabber Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0483 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0483 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data