CVE-2019-12428
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 6.8 through 11.11. Users could bypass the mandatory external authentication provider sign-in restrictions by sending a specially crafted request. It has Improper Authorization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab Community and Enterprise Edition versions 6.8 through 11.11 contained an improper authorization vulnerability where users could bypass mandatory external authentication provider sign-in restrictions by sending specially crafted requests. This allowed attackers to potentially access the GitLab instance without proper authentication through the configured external identity provider.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.8.0, <= 11.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin panel under /admin/about to see the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within >= 6.8.0 and <= 11.11.0
-
Verify external authentication provider configurationCheck GitLab admin settings at /admin/application_settings/general under 'Authentication' section, or inspect /etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb for LDAP, SAML, OAuth, or similar provider settingsAffected if An external identity provider (LDAP, SAML, OAuth, etc.) is configured and enforced as mandatory
-
Confirm mandatory external authentication is enabledReview the external authentication provider settings to determine if the 'mandatory' or 'required' sign-in restriction is configured, preventing local GitLab authenticationAffected if External authentication is set as mandatory, requiring all users to authenticate through the external provider only
-
Check authentication logs for suspicious access patternsReview GitLab production logs (typically in /var/log/gitlab/gitlab-rails/production.log) for requests that may have bypassed the external authentication flow, looking for successful authentications without external provider tokensAffected if Unusual authentication patterns exist in logs, such as sessions created without corresponding external provider authentication events
You are affected if your GitLab version is between 6.8.0 and 11.11.0 AND you have a mandatory external authentication provider configured that could be bypassed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade GitLab to version 11.12 or later to patch this authorization bypass. Review authentication logs for unauthorized access attempts during the vulnerable period.
GitLab 11.12.0 or later (recommended: latest stable 11.x or 12.x release)
- Back up your GitLab instance data before starting the upgrade
- Ensure your system meets the requirements for the target GitLab version
- Follow the official GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (Omnibus, source, or Docker)
- Upgrade GitLab from 11.11.0 to version 11.12.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify that the external authentication provider sign-in restrictions are enforced correctly
- Test that users can no longer bypass mandatory external authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12428 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12428 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data