CVE-2019-5883
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incorrect Access Control issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 6.0 and later but before 11.3.11, 11.4.x before 11.4.8, and 11.5.x before 11.5.1. The issue comments feature could allow a user to comment on an issue which they shouldn't be allowed to.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab contains an incorrect access control vulnerability in its issue comments feature that allows authenticated users to comment on issues they should not have permission to access. This is a broken access control vulnerability where authorization checks are not properly enforced when creating comments on protected issues.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 11.3.11>= 11.4.0, < 11.4.8>= 11.5.0, < 11.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine GitLab versionRun 'gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' or check the version file in the GitLab installation directory (e.g., /opt/gitlab/version for Omnibus installations, or /home/git/gitlab/VERSION for source installations)Affected if The version shown falls within any of these ranges: >= 6.0.0 and < 11.3.11, >= 11.4.0 and < 11.4.8, or >= 11.5.0 and < 11.5.1
-
Confirm issue tracking is enabledLog into GitLab as an administrator and navigate to Admin Area > Settings > General > Visibility and access controls. Verify that the Issues feature is enabled for the instance or relevant projectsAffected if The Issues feature is enabled and the GitLab version is in the affected ranges listed above
-
Test authorization boundary (optional)Create two separate users. Have User A create a private project with an issue. As User B (who has no access to that private project), attempt to add a comment to that issue via API or direct URL if knownAffected if User B can successfully post a comment on the issue despite having no project access - this confirms the vulnerability is exploitable
If your GitLab version falls within 6.0.0 to 11.3.10, 11.4.0 to 11.4.7, or 11.5.0, and the Issues feature is enabled, your instance is affected by this broken access control flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.3.1111.4.811.5.1
Upgrade GitLab to version 11.3.11, 11.4.8, 11.5.1 or later to resolve the authorization bypass in the issue comments feature.
Upgrade to GitLab 11.5.1 or later (recommended: latest stable 11.x release or migrate to a supported version like 12.x/13.x)
- 1. Backup your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Identify your current GitLab version by navigating to the GitLab admin area or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 3. Plan your upgrade path based on your current version: if below 11.3.0, upgrade through intermediate versions to 11.5.1 or later; if between 11.3.x and 11.4.x, upgrade to 11.4.8 or later; if between 11.5.0, upgrade to 11.5.1 or later
- 4. For GitLab installations using Omnibus, run `apt-get update && apt-get install gitlab-ce` (or `gitlab-ee` for Enterprise Edition)
- 5. For source installations, follow the upgrade documentation at https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/update/
- 6. After upgrade, run `gitlab-ctl reconfigure` and verify the new version with `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- 7. Test the issue comments functionality to confirm the access control fix is working correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5883 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5883 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data