CVE-2020-10075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGitLab 12.5 through 12.8.1 allows HTML Injection. A particular error header was potentially susceptible to injection or potentially other vulnerabilities via unescaped input.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHTML Injection vulnerability in GitLab 12.5 through 12.8.1 where an error header does not properly escape user-controlled input, allowing injection of malicious HTML content into the header response.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.5.0, <= 12.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionAccess the GitLab admin area and navigate to the version information page, or use the API endpoint GET /api/v4/version, or run the command 'gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info' from the GitLab server consoleAffected if The version displayed is between 12.5.0 and 12.8.1 inclusive
-
Confirm version number formatVerify the exact version string shown matches the affected range (e.g., 12.5.0, 12.5.1, 12.6.0, 12.7.0, 12.8.0, or 12.8.1)Affected if The displayed version exactly matches one of the versions in the 12.5.0 to 12.8.1 range
-
Determine if GitLab web interface is accessibleVerify that the GitLab instance is running and the web interface or API endpoints are reachable over HTTP/HTTPSAffected if The web interface is accessible and the vulnerable error header code path can be triggered by user input
You are affected if your installed GitLab version is 12.5.0, 12.5.1, 12.6.0, 12.6.1, 12.6.2, 12.7.0, 12.7.1, 12.8.0, or 12.8.1 and the application processes user-controlled input into error headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to GitLab 12.8.2 or later, and implement proper output encoding/escaping of all user input before including it in HTTP headers.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data