CVE-2021-26323
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFailure to validate SEV Commands while SNP is active may result in a potential impact to memory integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis AMD vulnerability allows improper SEV (Secure Encrypted Virtualization) command validation when SNP (Secure Nested Paging) is active, potentially compromising memory integrity. The flaw exists in the hardware/firmware layer of AMD processors and could allow attackers to manipulate memory protection mechanisms in virtualized environments using SEV-SNP.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun 'dmidecode -s processor-version' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep 'model name'' to identify the CPU. Compare the model number against the list: 7232p, 7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p.Affected if The processor is one of the listed affected Epyc models.
-
Check the system firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or use vendor-specific tools (e.g., AMD's firmware update utility) to retrieve the current firmware version string.Affected if The firmware version is below romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (for Epyc 7232p) or below milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (for all Milan-based models).
-
Determine if SEV-SNP is enabled in the hypervisorOn the host, check for SEV-SNP support via 'cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/sev_snp' or by querying the hypervisor's SEV capabilities. In a guest VM, inspect CPU flags for 'sev_es' or check via 'virt-host-validate'.Affected if SEV-SNP is actively enabled and in use by virtual machines on the host.
-
Verify SEV-SNP active status in running VMsFor each running VM, query the hypervisor (e.g., 'virsh domcapabilities' or Hyper-V VM configuration) to confirm that SEV-SNP is configured for that guest.Affected if Any VM is running with SEV-SNP enabled on an affected processor with vulnerable firmware.
You are affected if you run any VM with SEV-SNP enabled on an AMD Epyc 7232p, 7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, or 7543p processor with firmware versions below the specified thresholds.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply AMD-provided firmware/microcode updates and ensure hypervisor (e.g., SEV-capable KVM, Hyper-V) is updated to versions that enforce proper command validation with SNP enabled; consider disabling SEV-SNP in high-security contexts if updates are unavailable.
Firmware version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (Epyc 7232p) or milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (all Milan-based Epyc models)
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc processor model in your system using tools like 'dmidecode' or BIOS information.
- 2. Determine the current firmware version installed on the system by checking the AMD SEV firmware/BIOS settings or using platform-specific tools.
- 3. Download the latest AMD Epyc firmware update from the official AMD website (www.amd.com) or your server manufacturer's support page.
- 4. Apply the firmware update following the vendor's instructions - this typically involves flashing the new firmware via BIOS update, BMC/IPMI, or vendor-specific update utilities.
- 5. After updating, verify the firmware version matches or exceeds the fixed release: romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c for Epyc 7232p, or milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 for all Milan-based Epyc processors (7763, 7713, 7713p, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p).
- 6. If SNP (Secure Nested Paging) is in use, confirm the update was applied successfully and re-verify SEV command validation is functioning correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26323 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26323 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data