CVE-2021-26372
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient bound checks related to PCIE in the System Management Unit (SMU) may result in access to an invalid address space that could result in denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient bound checks in the System Management Unit (SMU) related to PCIE operations allow an attacker to trigger access to invalid address spaces, potentially causing the system to crash or become unresponsive (denial of service). This is a firmware-level vulnerability in the SMU, which manages power and performance features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.dCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun `dmidecode -t processor` or `cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep 'model name'` to confirm the CPU is one of the affected models: 7232p, 7302p, 7402p, 7502p, 7702p, 7252, 7262, or 7272Affected if The installed CPU model matches one of the listed affected Epyc processors
-
Retrieve the SMU firmware versionUse `dmidecode -t bios` to read the BIOS firmware version, or use vendor-specific tools such as AMD's firmware update utility (e.g., `amd_smu_info` or IPMI commands) to query the System Management Unit firmware version directly. The version string typically appears as a build identifier like 'romepi-sp3_x.x.x.x'Affected if The SMU firmware version cannot be retrieved or shows a version string below 'romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d'
-
Compare firmware version against the affected thresholdIf the SMU firmware version is readable, compare the full version string numerically or lexicographically against 'romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d'. Ensure the comparison accounts for the full build identifier including any suffix lettersAffected if The displayed firmware version is older than romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d (e.g., romepi-sp3_0.9.x or any earlier build)
-
Check for vendor BIOS/UEFI updatesConsult the system BIOS/UEFI setup (accessible via boot-time key such as F2 or Delete) or use the server management interface (BMC/IPMI) to review the current firmware revision strings listed under the SMU or System Firmware sectionAffected if The BMC/BIOS firmware revision log shows an SMU version prior to romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed AMD Epyc models with SMU firmware versions earlier than romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied firmware/BIOS updates from the hardware manufacturer (typically AMD for SMU firmware). This may require updating the System Management Unit firmware through the BIOS/UEFI or vendor-specific update utilities.
romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d or later
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc processor model in the system using CPU-Z or system inventory tools
- 2. Navigate to the AMD support website and locate the firmware download section for the specific Epyc processor model
- 3. Download the System Management Unit (SMU) firmware version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d or later
- 4. Follow AMD's documented firmware update procedure, which typically requires accessing the BMC/IPMI interface or using AMD's firmware update utilities
- 5. Verify the firmware version has been successfully applied after the update process completes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26372 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data