CVE-2021-26373
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient bound checks in the System Management Unit (SMU) may result in a system voltage malfunction that could result in denial of resources and/or possibly denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient bound checking in AMD's System Management Unit (SMU) firmware allows malformed voltage requests to pass validation, potentially causing the SMU to set incorrect voltage levels. This voltage malfunction can destabilize the processor and connected components, leading to system resource unavailability or complete denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.dCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the processor modelUse 'dmidecode -t processor' or check system BIOS/UEFI information to confirm the installed CPU is one of these models: Epyc 7232p, 7302p, 7402p, 7502p, 7702p, 7252, 7262, or 7272Affected if The installed CPU matches any of these eight Epyc model numbers
-
Retrieve the SMU firmware versionAccess the BMC/IPMI interface or use AMD-specific tools (such as 'ipmi' or vendor-provided firmware utilities) to query the System Management Unit firmware version. The version string typically appears as 'romepi-sp3_X.X.X.X' or similarAffected if The SMU firmware version cannot be determined or is not visible through standard interfaces
-
Compare firmware version to the affected rangeIf the SMU firmware version is obtained, compare it against 'romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d'. Versions numerically lower than this string (such as earlier 1.0.0.x releases) are considered vulnerableAffected if The installed firmware version string is less than 'romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d' (for example, romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c or earlier)
-
Check for voltage management activityMonitor system voltage readings using IPMI sensors, BMC logs, or operating system tools (like 'ipmiutil sensor' or 'lm_sensors'). Look for any voltage anomalies or unexpected voltage values being reported by the SMUAffected if Sustained voltage irregularities are observed, which may indicate exploitation of the bound checking flaw
You are affected if you have any of the listed Epyc models (7232p through 7272) running SMU firmware versions earlier than romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d, with the vulnerability manifestable through the SMU voltage request mechanism.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied SMU/firmware microcode updates from AMD. For systems where updates are unavailable, implement monitoring for voltage anomalies and consider system replacement if sustained stability is required. Test firmware updates in non-production environments before deployment.
romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d or later
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc model number in the affected system using either BIOS information, system inventory, or physical label inspection.
- 2. Navigate to the AMD Epyc support page at www.amd.com and locate the firmware download section for the specific processor model.
- 3. Download the latest System Management Unit (SMU) firmware package (version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d or later) compatible with the affected processor.
- 4. Follow AMD's standard firmware update procedure, which typically involves: a) Backup current system configuration, b) Run the firmware update utility, c) Allow the update process to complete without interruption, d) Reboot the system to apply the new firmware.
- 5. After reboot, verify the SMU firmware version has been updated to romepi-sp3_1.0.0.d or later using AMD's diagnostic tools or system management interfaces.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26373 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26373 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data