CVE-2021-26348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFailure to flush the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) of the I/O memory management unit (IOMMU) may lead an IO device to write to memory it should not be able to access, resulting in a potential loss of integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability stems from the IOMMU (I/O Memory Management Unit) failing to properly flush its TLB (Translation Lookaside Buffer). When the TLB is not flushed after changes to page tables, an I/O device may retain stale translations that grant access to memory regions it should no longer be able to write to, compromising memory integrity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CPU modelRun 'dmidecode -s processor-version' or check /proc/cpuinfo to determine the exact AMD Epyc processor modelAffected if The CPU model is one of: Epyc 7763, Epyc 7713p, Epyc 7713, Epyc 7663, Epyc 7643, Epyc 75f3, Epyc 7543p, or Epyc 7543
-
Check firmware versionUse 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or access the BIOS/UEFI firmware version information via IPMI, BMC, or during boot. Compare against the version string 'milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7'Affected if The firmware version is lower than milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7
-
Verify IOMMU is enabledCheck BIOS/UEFI settings for IOMMU or AMD-Vi configuration, or run 'dmesg | grep -i iommu' to see if IOMMU is active at runtimeAffected if IOMMU is enabled in the system (the vulnerability only applies when IOMMU is active)
You are affected if you run any of the listed AMD Epyc models with firmware below milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7 and have IOMMU enabled in your system configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided BIOS/firmware updates that address the IOMMU TLB flush issue. Verify that IOMMU settings are properly configured and test system stability after applying the update.
milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7 or later
- Obtain the updated firmware version milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.7 or later from AMD's official support website for your specific Epyc processor model
- Follow AMD's standard firmware update procedure, which typically involves using the AMD firmware update tool or BMC/BIOS update utilities
- Ensure the system is powered on and stable during the firmware update process
- After updating, verify the firmware version has been successfully applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data