CVE-2021-39875
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn all versions of GitLab CE/EE since version 13.6, it is possible to see pending invitations of any public group or public project by visiting an API endpoint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn GitLab CE/EE versions 13.6 and later, an API endpoint for public groups and projects exposes pending invitation data without proper authorization checks, allowing any user to view sensitive invitation details (email addresses, names, and other enrollment information) for public groups and projects they should not have access to.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.6.0, < 14.1.7>= 14.2.0, < 14.2.5= 4.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab admin area under Help > Version. Alternatively, check the omnibus package version with `gitlab-rpm -q gitlab-ee` or `gitlab-ce` depending on your edition.Affected if The installed version falls within >= 13.6.0, < 14.1.7; >= 14.2.0, < 14.2.5; or equals 14.3.0 (note: the original advisory shows = 4.3.0 which may be a typo for 14.3.0).
-
Determine if public groups existUse the GitLab API with a low-privilege or unauthenticated user: `GET /api/v4/groups?all_available=true` or browse the public groups page. Identify groups marked as public visibility.Affected if Any public groups exist in the GitLab instance.
-
Check for pending group/project invitationsVia GitLab admin area, navigate to a public group > Settings > Members > Invite members. Look for any pending invitations with email addresses. Alternatively, use API: `GET /api/v4/groups/:id/invitations` (requires authentication).Affected if There are pending invitations (emails not yet accepted) on any public group or project.
-
Test unauthorized access to invitation dataUsing a user WITHOUT admin or owner privileges, make an API request to a public group's invitations endpoint: `GET /api/v4/groups/:group_id/invitations` or for projects: `GET /api/v4/projects/:project_id/invitations`. Compare the response against what the user should legitimately see.Affected if The API returns pending invitation details (email addresses, names) for groups/projects the test user does not own or administer.
You are affected if running a GitLab version in the affected ranges AND your instance has public groups or projects with pending member invitations, AND a low-privilege user can retrieve those invitation details via the API without proper authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.714.2.5
Upgrade to GitLab versions 14.3.2, 14.2.5, or 14.1.6 or later, or apply available security patches. Alternatively, if upgrade is not immediately feasible, restrict access to sensitive group/project membership data through additional access controls.
14.1.7, 14.2.5, or latest stable 14.3.x+
- Identify the currently installed GitLab version using `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or the GitLab admin panel
- Backup the GitLab database and repository data before upgrading
- Consult the GitLab upgrade documentation for your current version to ensure a supported upgrade path
- Upgrade to version 14.1.7 or later if currently on 14.1.x
- Upgrade to version 14.2.5 or later if currently on 14.2.x
- Alternatively, upgrade to the latest stable version (14.3.0 or higher) which contains all security fixes
- After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming the API endpoint no longer returns pending invitations for public groups/projects
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39875 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39875 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data