CVE-2022-0283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered affecting GitLab versions prior to 13.5. An open redirect vulnerability was fixed in GitLab integration with Jira that a could cause the web application to redirect the request to the attacker specified URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpen redirect vulnerability in GitLab's Jira integration allows attackers to craft malicious URLs that cause the application to redirect users to attacker-controlled websites, potentially facilitating phishing attacks or credential theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.5, < 14.5.4>= 14.6, < 14.6.4= 14.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GitLab versionAccess the GitLab admin area or run `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` from the server command line to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version is 13.5 to 14.5.3, 14.6.0 to 14.6.3, or 14.7.0
-
Confirm Jira integration is enabledNavigate to GitLab admin settings > Integrations > Jira, or check via API at /api/v4/integrations, to verify the Jira integration has been configuredAffected if Jira integration is active and connected to a Jira instance
-
Verify redirect handling in Jira integration settingsInspect the Jira integration configuration for any redirect_url parameters or custom URL fields that could be manipulated, or test by submitting a Jira integration request with an external redirect targetAffected if The system accepts and processes redirect URLs without validation in the Jira integration context
A user is affected if their GitLab version falls within 13.5 to 14.5.3, 14.6.0 to 14.6.3, or 14.7.0 AND the Jira integration feature is enabled and configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.5.414.6.4
Upgrade GitLab to version 13.5 or later to patch the open redirect vulnerability in the Jira integration feature.
GitLab 14.8 or later (latest stable 14.x release)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Plan for appropriate maintenance window as upgrade may require downtime
- 3. Review GitLab upgrade documentation for your specific deployment method (omnibus, source, etc.)
- 4. Execute the upgrade to GitLab version 14.5.4 or later (if currently on 13.x or early 14.x), or 14.6.4 or later (if on 14.6.x), or ideally version 14.8 or later for all affected branches
- 5. After upgrade, verify GitLab is functioning correctly
- 6. Test the Jira integration to confirm it works as expected post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-0283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-0283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data