CVE-2022-1963
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 13.4 before 14.10.5, all versions starting from 15.0 before 15.0.4, all versions starting from 15.1 before 15.1.1. GitLab reveals if a user has enabled two-factor authentication on their account in the HTML source, to unauthenticated users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGitLab CE/EE exposes whether a user has enabled two-factor authentication in the HTML source to unauthenticated (non-logged-in) visitors. This information disclosure occurs through the user interface or API responses that include 2FA status in page HTML, allowing attackers to enumerate which accounts have enhanced security.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.4.0, < 14.10.5>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.4= 15.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check GitLab versionRun command: sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info or check in Admin Area > Dashboard under VersionAffected if Version is >= 13.4.0 and < 14.10.5, OR >= 15.0.0 and < 15.0.4, OR exactly 15.1.0
-
Verify 2FA status visibility in unauthenticated HTMLOpen a private/incognito browser window, navigate to any user profile page (e.g., https://your-gitlab-instance/username), then view page source (right-click > View Page Source) and search for terms like 'two_factor', '2fa', 'two-factor', or 'otp'Affected if HTML source reveals any 2FA-related fields, status indicators, or security settings for the user without being logged in
-
Check API endpoint for 2FA information leakUse a tool like curl to send an unauthenticated GET request to the users API endpoint: curl https://your-gitlab-instance/api/v4/users/[user_id] and examine the JSON response for 2FA-related fieldsAffected if API response includes two_factor_enabled, otp_enabled, or similar fields to unauthenticated callers
Environment is affected if GitLab version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND 2FA status is exposed in unauthenticated HTTP responses or HTML source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.10.515.0.4
Upgrade GitLab to versions 14.10.5, 15.0.4, 15.1.1 or later. Self-hosted deployments should apply the patch version corresponding to their current major release.
14.10.5+, 15.0.4+, or 15.1.1+ depending on your branch
- Identify your current GitLab version by checking the GitLab admin area or running `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`
- Determine which version branch you are on (14.x, 15.0.x, or 15.1.x)
- For GitLab 14.x (versions 13.4.0 to 14.10.4): Upgrade to version 14.10.5 or later
- For GitLab 15.0.x (versions 15.0.0 to 15.0.3): Upgrade to version 15.0.4 or later
- For GitLab 15.1.0: Upgrade to version 15.1.1 or later
- After upgrade, verify the fix by checking that unauthenticated user HTML responses no longer reveal 2FA status information
- Consult GitLab upgrade documentation for your specific installation method (omnibus, source, etc.) for proper upgrade procedures
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1963 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1963 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data