GitLabApplication

CVE-2022-2534

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 15.0.5 / 15.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 9.3 before 15.0.5, all versions starting from 15.1 before 15.1.4, all versions starting from 15.2 before 15.2.1. GitLab was returning contributor emails due to improper data handling in the Datadog integration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GitLab CE/EE versions prior to 15.0.5, 15.1.4, and 15.2.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the Datadog integration where contributor email addresses were being improperly returned/exposed due to faulty data handling.

MitigationUpgrade GitLab to version 15.0.5 or later (for 14.x and earlier branches), 15.1.4 or later, or 15.2.1 or later. Alternatively, temporarily disable the Datadog integration if upgrading is not immediately feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GitLabApplication
Affected:>= 9.3.0, < 15.0.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.4= 15.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine your GitLab version
    Run `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check the GitLab Admin Area > Settings > General page to find the exact version number installed
    Affected if The installed version is 9.3.0 through 15.0.4, OR 15.1.0 through 15.1.3, OR exactly 15.2.0
  2. Verify if Datadog integration is configured
    Navigate to GitLab Admin Area > Settings > Integrations > Datadog, or check for Datadog settings in the project or group settings where the integration may have been enabled
    Affected if The Datadog integration is actively enabled or was previously enabled in any project or group within the GitLab instance
  3. Check for exposed contributor data
    Review any Datadog payloads, logs, or monitoring dashboards that receive data from GitLab to see if contributor email addresses appear in commit author or contributor metadata
    Affected if Contributor email addresses are visible in Datadog integration outputs or logs where they should not be present

You are affected if your GitLab version falls within the vulnerable ranges (pre-15.0.5, pre-15.1.4, or 15.2.x) AND the Datadog integration is or was enabled, exposing contributor email addresses.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 15.0.5 / 15.1.4 or later
Fixed in 15.0.515.1.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade GitLab to version 15.0.5 or later (for 14.x and earlier branches), 15.1.4 or later, or 15.2.1 or later. Alternatively, temporarily disable the Datadog integration if upgrading is not immediately feasible.

Recommended fix High confidence

15.0.5, 15.1.4, or 15.2.1 (depending on your current minor version branch)

  1. Back up your GitLab instance data and configuration before upgrading
  2. Follow the official GitLab upgrade documentation for your installation method (Omnibus, source, etc.)
  3. Ensure your system meets the requirements for the target version
  4. Upgrade to version 15.0.5 or later if currently on 9.3.0 - 15.0.x
  5. Upgrade to version 15.1.4 or later if currently on 15.1.0 - 15.1.x
  6. Upgrade to version 15.2.1 or later if currently on 15.2.x
  7. After upgrade, verify the Datadog integration is functioning correctly and that contributor emails are no longer exposed
Caveat Patch version upgrades typically have minimal breaking changes; review GitLab release notes for any deprecation notices

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in GitLab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2534 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2534 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data