CVE-2022-3411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA lack of length validation in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.4 before 15.6.7, 15.7 before 15.7.6, and 15.8 before 15.8.1 allows an authenticated attacker to create a large Issue description via GraphQL which, when repeatedly requested, saturates CPU usage.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in GitLab's GraphQL API where the issue description field lacks length validation. An authenticated attacker can create an issue with an excessively large description, and when this description is repeatedly requested (e.g., via API calls), it saturates CPU usage through resource exhaustion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.4, < 15.6.7>= 15.7, < 15.7.6>= 15.8, < 15.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GitLab versionRun `gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info` or check `/opt/gitlab/version` (Omnibus) or `cat /var/opt/gitlab/gitlab-rails/VERSION` (self-managed). Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 12.4 to <15.6.7, 15.7 to <15.7.6, or 15.8 to <15.8.1Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges listed in the CVE
-
Confirm GraphQL API is exposedVerify that the GraphQL endpoint is accessible at your GitLab instance. Typically accessible at `/api/graphql` or `/graphql` depending on configuration. Check your web server or reverse proxy configuration for GraphQL route exposureAffected if GraphQL endpoint is publicly or internally accessible without proper restrictions
-
Check for issues with unusually large descriptionsQuery the GitLab database for issues with description fields exceeding typical lengths. Example SQL: `SELECT id, project_id, description_length FROM issues WHERE LENGTH(description) > 10000;` Adjust the threshold based on your environment's normal usageAffected if Database contains issues with description lengths significantly larger than normal (e.g., >10KB)
-
Review GraphQL endpoint rate limitingCheck GitLab configuration files (e.g., `/etc/gitlab/gitlab.rb`) for rate limiting settings on GraphQL endpoints. Look for `gitlab_rails['graphql_api_rate_limit']` or similar rate limit configurationsAffected if No rate limiting is configured on the GraphQL API endpoint
Your environment is affected if GitLab version is within the affected ranges AND the GraphQL API is accessible without rate limiting protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.6.715.7.615.8.1
Upgrade to GitLab 15.6.7, 15.7.6, or 15.8.1 or later. As a compensating control, implement rate limiting on GraphQL endpoints and monitor for unusual patterns of issue creation or retrieval.
Upgrade to GitLab 15.8.1 or later (recommended: latest stable 15.x release such as 15.11.x)
- 1. Back up your GitLab instance database and configuration files.
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade.
- 3. For Debian/Ubuntu: Run `sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install gitlab-ce` (or `gitlab-ee` for Enterprise Edition).
- 4. For RHEL/CentOS: Run `sudo yum install gitlab-ce` (or `gitlab-ee`).
- 5. Run `sudo gitlab-ctl reconfigure` to apply configuration changes.
- 6. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the GitLab version with `sudo gitlab-rake gitlab:env:info`.
- 7. Test that issue creation via GraphQL API functions correctly with appropriate length constraints.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data