dbcve.org
Team\+ ProApplication · Teamplus

CVE-2022-35220

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.011.6.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Teamplus Pro community discussion function has an ‘allocation of resource without limits or throttling’ vulnerability. A remote attacker with general user privilege posting a thread with large content can cause the receiving client device to allocate too much memory, leading to abnormal termination of this client’s Teamplus Pro application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Teamplus Pro's community discussion function lacks proper input validation and size limits on thread content. A remote authenticated user can post threads with excessively large content, causing receiving client devices to attempt allocation of too much memory when rendering the content, resulting in application crash.

MitigationImplement server-side content length validation with reasonable limits on the discussion posting function, and add client-side memory management/throttling to gracefully handle large content without crashing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Team\+ ProApplication
Affected:<= 3.011.6.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Teamplus Team+ Pro installation
    Locate the Teamplus installation directory (commonly C:\Program Files\Teamplus or C:\Program Files (x86)\Teamplus) and confirm the presence of the main application executable, or check Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Teamplus for installation evidence
    Affected if Teamplus Team+ Pro is found installed on the system
  2. Determine installed version number
    Right-click the main executable (teamplus.exe or similar), select Properties, and check the Product version field in the Details tab, or query the Windows registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Teamplus\ProductVersion
    Affected if Version is 3.011.6.0.1 or lower
  3. Confirm community discussion feature is enabled
    Log into Teamplus Pro as an authenticated user and attempt to access the community discussion module (typically labeled as Community, Discussion, or Forum in the collaboration features), or inspect the application's module configuration file for enabled discussion components
    Affected if Community discussion module is present and accessible to authenticated users
  4. Inspect content length validation settings
    Examine the Teamplus server configuration files (commonly in the config or settings subdirectory) for parameters controlling discussion post size limits, such as MaxThreadLength, PostSizeLimit, or ContentMaxSize
    Affected if No server-side content length limit is defined, or the configured limit allows content exceeding reasonable bounds (several megabytes or more)

Environment is affected if Teamplus Team+ Pro version 3.011.6.0.1 or lower is installed with the community discussion feature enabled and without server-enforced content length restrictions on thread posts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.011.6.0.1
Interim mitigation

Implement server-side content length validation with reasonable limits on the discussion posting function, and add client-side memory management/throttling to gracefully handle large content without crashing.

Recommended fix Low confidence

Any version newer than 3.011.6.0.1 (contact vendor for exact patched release)

  1. 1. Check the current installed version of Team+ Pro by navigating to the application settings or about menu
  2. 2. Contact Teamplus vendor or visit their official support website to obtain the patched version newer than 3.011.6.0.1
  3. 3. Download the latest stable version of Team+ Pro from the official vendor source
  4. 4. Ensure any active Team+ Pro sessions are closed before proceeding with the update
  5. 5. Run the installer and follow the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
  6. 6. After installation, verify the new version number in the application settings
  7. 7. Test the community discussion function to confirm normal operation with large content handling
Caveat Review vendor release notes for any changes to functionality or compatibility requirements before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Team\+ Pro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,290
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-35220 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-35220 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data